Morbidity attributed to the five defined cardiovascular risk factors was high in the Chinese population, with multiple risk factors present in the same individual. Therefore, reasonable prevention strategies should be designed to attenuate the rapid rise in cardiovascular morbidity.
AimsThe present study aimed to assess the prevalence of hypertension among Chinese adults.MethodsData were obtained from sphygmomanometer measurements and a questionnaire administered to 46239 Chinese adults ≥20 years of age who participated in the 2007–2008 China National Diabetes and Metabolic Disorders Study. Hypertension was defined as blood pressure ≥140/90 mm Hg or use of antihypertensive medication.ResultsA total of 26.6% of Chinese adults had hypertension, and a significantly greater number of men were hypertensive than women (29.2% vs 24.1%, p<0.001). The age-specific prevalence of hypertension was 13.0%, 36.7%, and 56.5% among persons aged 20 to 44 years (young people), 45 to 64 years (middle-aged people), and ≥65 years (elderly people), respectively. In economically developed regions, the prevalence of hypertension was significantly higher among rural residents than among urban residents (31.3% vs 29.2%, p = 0.001). Among women or individuals who lived in the northern region, the disparity in the prevalence of hypertension between urban and rural areas disappeared (women: 24.0% vs. 24.0%, p = 0.942; northern region: 31.6% vs. 31.2%, p = 0.505). Among hypertensive patients, 45.0% were aware of their condition, 36.2% were treated, and 11.1% were adequately controlled.ConclusionsThe prevalence of hypertension in China is increasing. The trend of an increase in prevalence is striking in young people and rural populations. Hypertension awareness, treatment, and control are poor. Public health efforts for further improving awareness and enhancing effective control are urgently needed in China, especially in emerging populations.
To investigate the effect of antidiabetic agents on nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), 75 patients with T2DM and NAFLD under inadequate glycemic control by metformin were randomized (1:1:1) to receive add‐on liraglutide, sitagliptin, or insulin glargine in this 26‐week trial. The primary endpoint was the change in intrahepatic lipid (IHL) from baseline to week 26 as quantified by magnetic resonance imaging–estimated proton density fat fraction (MRI‐PDFF). Secondary endpoints included changes in abdominal adiposity (subcutaneous adipose tissue [SAT] and visceral adipose tissue [VAT]), glycated hemoglobin, and body weight from baseline to week 26. We analysed data from intent‐to‐treat population. MRI‐PDFF, VAT, and weight decreased significantly with liraglutide (15.4% ± 5.6% to 12.5% ± 6.4%,
P
< 0.001; 171.4 ± 27.8 to 150.5 ± 30.8,
P
= 0.003; 86.6 ± 12.9 kg to 82.9 ± 11.1 kg,
P
= 0.005, respectively) and sitagliptin (15.5% ± 5.6% to 11.7% ± 5.0%,
P
= 0.001; 153.4 ± 31.5 to 139.8 ± 27.3,
P
= 0.027; 88.2 ± 13.6 kg to 86.5 ± 13.2 kg,
P
= 0.005, respectively). No significant change in MRI‐PDFF, VAT, or body weight was observed with insulin glargine. SAT decreased significantly in the liraglutide group (239.9 ± 69.0 to 211.3 ± 76.1;
P
= 0.020) but not in the sitagliptin and insulin glargine groups. Changes from baseline in MRI‐PDFF, VAT, and body weight were significantly greater with liraglutide than insulin glargine but did not differ significantly between liraglutide and sitagliptin.
Conclusion:
Combined with metformin, both liraglutide and sitagliptin, but not insulin glargine, reduced body weight, IHL, and VAT in addition to improving glycemic control in patients with T2DM and NAFLD.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.