A Bibliometric Review of Research Trends in Neuroimaging

Yeung, Andy Wai Kan; Goto, Tazuko K.; Leung, W. Keung

doi:10.18520/cs/v112/i04/725-734

Cited by 52 publications

(40 citation statements)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Meanwhile, there are some inherent limitations in the use of ALE; for instance, some of the included studies had a relatively small sample size, which may lead to corresponding low statistical power and hence weaken the power of overall analysis (Lin et al., ). Also, ALE meta‐analysis focuses on consistency of activated brain locations but does not consider effect size of the activations (Eickhoff et al., ) and cannot model brain connectivity which is gaining popularity over the recent years (Yeung, Goto, & Leung, ,c,d; Yeung, Tanabe, Suen, & Goto, ).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Brain responses to stimuli mimicking dental treatment among non‐phobic individuals: A meta‐analysis

2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Numerous neuroimaging studies have attempted to identify how the brain responds to stimuli mimicking dental treatment in normal non-phobic individuals. However, results were sometimes inconsistent due to small sample sizes and methodological variations. This meta-analysis employs standardized procedures to summarize data from previous studies to identify brain regions that were consistently activated across studies, elicited by stimuli such as pictures, sounds, or audiovisual footage mimicking those encountered during dental treatments. A systematic literature search was carried out using PubMed and Scopus. The meta-analysis analyzed data from 120 healthy subjects from seven neuroimaging studies. We assessed the risk of bias among the included studies with the Risk of Bias Assessment Tool for Nonrandomized Studies. One study appeared to have a high risk of selection bias, whereas the others were considered to have a low risk of bias. Results revealed three clusters of activation with cluster sizes ranging from 768 mm to 1,424 mm . Stimuli mimicking dental treatment consistently activated the bilateral anterior insula; right dorsal anterior cingulate, putamen, and medial prefrontal cortex; and left claustrum. This study confirmed that audio and/or visual stimuli mimicking dental treatment consistently activated the fear-related brain regions among healthy subjects, mostly consistent with activations from general anxiety but without the involvement of the amygdala.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Brain responses to stimuli mimicking dental treatment among non‐phobic individuals: A meta‐analysis

2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The total link strength of a node is the sum of link strengths of this node over all the other nodes. The node, "big data", has thicker lines with "care" (19), "risk" (14), "data mining" (12), "machine learning" (13), "electronic health records" (18), "challenges" (14), "systems" (13), "privacy" (15), and "personalized" (15). These are all the nodes whose link strengths are greater than 10.…”

Section: The Abstract Analysis Of Research Hotspots On Mbd Studymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The most obvious advantage of the bibliometrics is that it allows scholars to study specific research area by analyzing citations, co-citations, geographical distribution and word frequency, and draw very useful conclusions. Up to now, the bibliometrics has been widely used in hotspot research [15], co-authorship analysis [16], co-citation analysis [17], and the development of the whole subject fields [18].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Bibliometric Analysis and Visualization of Medical Big Data Research

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

With the rapid development of "Internet plus", medical care has entered the era of big data. However, there is little research on medical big data (MBD) from the perspectives of bibliometrics and visualization. The substantive research on the basic aspects of MBD itself is also rare. This study aims to explore the current status of medical big data through visualization analysis on the journal papers related to MBD. We analyze a total of 988 references which were downloaded from the Science Citation Index Expanded and the Social Science Citation Index databases from Web of Science and the time span was defined as "all years". The GraphPad Prism 5, VOSviewer and CiteSpace softwares are used for analysis. Many results concerning the annual trends, the top players in terms of journal and institute levels, the citations and H-index in terms of country level, the keywords distribution, the highly cited papers, the co-authorship status and the most influential journals and authors are presented in this paper. This study points out the development status and trends on MBD. It can help people in the medical profession to get comprehensive understanding on the state of the art of MBD. It also has reference values for the research and application of the MBD visualization methods.

show abstract

“…One useful metric to be evaluated would be the citation count of coronectomy papers. A bibliometric study identifies and evaluates the relevance of scientific publications with citation analysis, thus enabling a better understanding of the overall research landscape of a particular field . Instead of a qualitative evaluation of existing evidence or an investigation of the overall effect size, a bibliometric study on coronectomy literature can evaluate the influence of the body of the literature as a whole and identify the seminal works within it.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Are coronectomy studies being cited? A bibliometric study

Yeung

Wong

Leung

2018

J of Invest & Clin Dent

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim The aim of the present bibliometric study was to analyze the citations received by coronectomy papers and their references. Methods Data were extracted from the Web of Science online database. After excluding irrelevant papers, full record and cited references from 79 papers were downloaded and imported into VOSviewer and CRExplorer for bibliometric analyses. Results The 79 papers on coronectomy collectively had 9.7 citations per paper. The h‐index of this collection of papers was 17. The top five major contributing countries were the UK (N = 20, 25.3%), the USA (N = 10, 12.7%), Italy (N = 9, 11.4%), China (N = 5, 6.3%), and Turkey (N = 5, 6.3%). The top two major contributing journals, Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, together accounted for more than half of the 79 papers (N = 43, 54.4%). Conclusions Papers dealing with postoperative morbidity topics had high citation counts in general, such as dry socket (27.4 citations per paper), infection (24.6 citations per paper), and safety (35.5 citations per paper). Citation per paper correlated with publication count at the affiliation level, but not at the author, country, and journal levels.

show abstract

A Bibliometric Review of Research Trends in Neuroimaging

Cited by 52 publications

References 15 publications

Brain responses to stimuli mimicking dental treatment among non‐phobic individuals: A meta‐analysis

Brain responses to stimuli mimicking dental treatment among non‐phobic individuals: A meta‐analysis

A Bibliometric Analysis and Visualization of Medical Big Data Research

Are coronectomy studies being cited? A bibliometric study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About