2017
DOI: 10.2174/1567205014666170203095128
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Role of the Parasympathetic Nervous System in Cognitive Training

Abstract: Background Vision-based speed of processing (VSOP) training can result in broad cognitive improvements in older adults with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI). What remains unknown, however, is what neurophysiological mechanisms account for the observed training effect. Much of the work in this area has focused on the central nervous system, neglecting the fact that the peripheral system can contributes to changes of the central nervous system and vice versa. Objective We examined the prospective rela… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Notably, in our recent cognitive training study, cognitive training strengthened such efficiency in older adults with aMCI (Lin et al . ). The intervention approach may provide a viable pathway to determine the causal relationship between neural efficiency and HF‐HRV.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Notably, in our recent cognitive training study, cognitive training strengthened such efficiency in older adults with aMCI (Lin et al . ). The intervention approach may provide a viable pathway to determine the causal relationship between neural efficiency and HF‐HRV.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The next step will be to modify AD pathology or frontal neural efficiency (Lin et al . ), and examine the consequential changes in PNS as discussed above. Third, using voxel‐wise analysis, ACC was the only frontal region associated with HF‐HRV.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies have succeeded in explaining some of the interindividual variability in the magnitude of learning effects. Factors that have been identified to explain the magnitude of visual perceptual learning include baseline performance (poor initial performers tend to show larger improvements, typically explaining 40% to 60% of the outcome variance), [8][9][10][11][12] number of training sessions, 11,13 age 14 (but note that there are also studies that found no effect of age [15][16][17] ), motivation and intelligence, 18 performance feedback, [19][20][21] the accuracy of performance during training, 22 heart-rate variability, 23 and reactivity of dopaminergic and cholinergic neuromodulatory systems. 24,25 The goal of the present study was to evaluate the contribution of physiological factors, such as baseline performance, age, and clinical diagnosis, and a psychological factor, the perceived pleasantness of the training (training joy).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on our previous studies (Fig. 1) [35, 53, 54], we anticipate screening approximately 384 individuals in person to enroll 128 participants. Participants will then be followed for another 12 months ( n = 96 at 6 months with 25% attrition and n = 84 at 18 months with 35% attrition).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%