1989
DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.15.3.576
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accessing spoken words: The importance of word onsets.

Abstract: Approaches to spoken word recognition differ in the importance they assign to word onsets during lexical access. This research contrasted the hypothesis that lexical access is strongly directional with the hypothesis that word onsets are less important than the overall goodness of fit between input and lexical form. A cross-modal priming technique was used to investigate the extent to which a rhyme prime (a prime that differs only in its first segment from the word that is semantically associated with the visu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

43
296
5
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 330 publications
(345 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(30 reference statements)
43
296
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, through coarticulation, it is possible that longer competitors can be ruled out before the offset of an embedded word-at least for stimuli without garden-path following contexts. These results are consistent with prior work showing that single feature deviations at either the beginning (Connine, Blasko, & Titone, 1993;Marslen-Wilson et al, 1996;Marslen-Wilson & Zwitserlood, 1989) or the end of a word (Gaskell & MarslenWilson, 1996;Marslen-Wilson et al, 1995) are sufficient to disrupt the lexical access process.…”
Section: Sequential Recognition and Lexical Competitionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Indeed, through coarticulation, it is possible that longer competitors can be ruled out before the offset of an embedded word-at least for stimuli without garden-path following contexts. These results are consistent with prior work showing that single feature deviations at either the beginning (Connine, Blasko, & Titone, 1993;Marslen-Wilson et al, 1996;Marslen-Wilson & Zwitserlood, 1989) or the end of a word (Gaskell & MarslenWilson, 1996;Marslen-Wilson et al, 1995) are sufficient to disrupt the lexical access process.…”
Section: Sequential Recognition and Lexical Competitionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Similarly, derived citation form primes facilitate lexical decision for semantically related visual probe stimuli [21], and the same result has been found using an intramodal auditory priming paradigm with derived primes, and primes with phonetically ambiguous onset phonemes [22]. It should be noted that another study [23] failed to show priming by derived primes with word-initial segment features changed. These studies share several features.…”
Section: Temporal Dynamics Of Lexical Effectssupporting
confidence: 67%
“…In particular, the cohort theory of spoken word identification (Marslen-Wilson, 1987;Marslen-Wilson & Tyler, 1980) would seem to be a good approximation to melody identification because no theory places a stronger emphasis on the temporal structure of the to-be-identified stimulus (Juscyzk & Luce, 2002). Briefly, the cohort model relies on bottom-up processing and places special weight on initial sounds of the word (Marslen-Wilson & Zwitserlood, 1989;Marslen-Wilson, Moss, & van Halen, 1996). Initial sounds activate a cohort of words from the lexicon that share those initial sounds.…”
Section: How Is the Physical Stimulus Reconciled With Its Correspondingmentioning
confidence: 99%