Biases in research: risk factors for non-replicability in psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy research

Abstract

Replicability of findings is an essential prerequisite of research. For both basic and clinical research, however, low replicability of findings has recently been reported. Replicability may be affected by research biases not sufficiently controlled for by the existing research standards. Several biases such as researcher allegiance or selective reporting are well-known for affecting results. For psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy research, specific additional biases may affect outcome (e.g. therapist allegiance, therapist effects or impairments in treatment implementation). For meta-analyses further specific biases are relevant. In psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy research these biases have not yet been systematically discussed in the context of replicability. Using a list of 13 biases as a starting point, we discuss each bias's impact on replicability. We illustrate each bias by selective findings of recent research, showing that (1) several biases are not yet sufficiently controlled for by the presently applied research standards, (2) these biases have a pernicious effect on replicability of findings. For the sake of research credibility, it is critical to avoid these biases in future research. To control for biases and to improve replicability, we propose to systematically implement several measures in psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy research, such as adversarial collaboration (inviting academic rivals to collaborate), reviewing study design prior to knowing the results, triple-blind data analysis (including subjects, investigators and data managers/statisticians), data analysis by other research teams (crowdsourcing), and, last not least, updating reporting standards such as CONSORT or the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR).

The evidence‐based group‐level symptom‐reduction model as the organizing principle for mental health care: time for change?

“…Just as there is methodological and statistical doubt as to what degree even a well‐established psychotherapy like cognitive‐behavioral therapy (CBT) is at all effective, doubt has been voiced as to what degree medications like antidepressants have real effects.…”

Internet-delivered cognitive-behavioral therapy for significant others of treatment-refusing problem gamblers: A randomized wait-list controlled trial.

“…In this section, I will cover different biases and flaws that are threats to the quality of the evidence. As noted by Leichsenring et al (2017), although, biases are recognized in the literature, several important biases are not controlled for, and as stated by Cuijpers et al (2018a), psychotherapy researchers tend not to be aware of the fundamental problems.…”

Recruiting families and children newly diagnosed with cancer for behavioral research: Important considerations and successful strategies

“…Behavioral research is often criticized for its lack of reproducibility . Suboptimal recruitment and retention rates contribute to lack of replication, inadequate statistical power, ascertainment bias, threats to generalizability, and reduced internal validity, diminishing impact .…”

“…Behavioral research is often criticized for its lack of reproducibility. 1 Suboptimal recruitment and retention rates contribute to lack of replication, inadequate statistical power, ascertainment bias, threats to generalizability, and reduced internal validity, diminishing impact. 2 Although recruitment and retention are critical, it is challenging to recruit families for research, particularly while they are experiencing the acute stress of a child's cancer diagnosis.…”