2020
DOI: 10.1017/s1355617720000326
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cognitive Reserve Proxies Do Not Differentially Account for Cognitive Performance in Patients with Focal Frontal and Non-Frontal Lesions

Abstract: Objective: Cognitive reserve (CR) suggests that premorbid efficacy, aptitude, and flexibility of cognitive processing can aid the brain’s ability to cope with change or damage. Our previous work has shown that age and literacy attainment predict the cognitive performance of frontal patients on frontal-executive tests. However, it remains unknown whether CR also predicts the cognitive performance of non-frontal patients. Method: We investigated the independent effect of a CR proxy, Nation… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
(95 reference statements)
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, CR may work via compensatory mechanisms that are supported by alternative neural networks [1], mostly via increased involvement of prefrontal cortex processes and associated executive control processes [3]. However, a very recent study in unilateral frontal and non-frontal stroke patients failed to support this notion, showing that CR similarly influences cognitive performance in both patient groups [15]. The extent to which existing versus compensatory mechanisms are involved in the current study findings as well as in maintaining cognition in aging in general, requires further investigation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, CR may work via compensatory mechanisms that are supported by alternative neural networks [1], mostly via increased involvement of prefrontal cortex processes and associated executive control processes [3]. However, a very recent study in unilateral frontal and non-frontal stroke patients failed to support this notion, showing that CR similarly influences cognitive performance in both patient groups [15]. The extent to which existing versus compensatory mechanisms are involved in the current study findings as well as in maintaining cognition in aging in general, requires further investigation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous comparison of a large frontal and non-frontal sample with different aetiologies on the APM and other executive tests showed that aetiology was not a strong predictor of frontal or non-frontal deficits. 9, 108 Hence, different aetiologies do not result in more severe impairments than others and combining across vascular and tumour pathologies is unlikely to significantly distort neuropsychological performance. 76 Instead, focal lesions may relate more closely to the region of damage rather than aetiology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, we found that the occupational complexity "data" domain predicts verbal working memory scores. In recent years, the effects of CR have been investigated not only in dementia or aging, but also in a broader range of disorders, such as traumatic brain injury and stroke [28], [30], [33] ; however, no study had focused on occupational complexity as a CR in patients with frontal lobe tumors. To our knowledge, this is the rst study to demonstrate that occupational complexity, as a CR, predicts working memory after tumor resection in patients with frontal lobe tumors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In studies on patients with traumatic brain injuries, a higher premorbid IQ as a CR proxy was associated with less cognitive decline after injury [31], [32] . Further, CR has been shown to have a protective effect against working memory impairments from traumatic brain injury and stroke [28], [32], [33], [34] . Considering the above evidence, CR should have protective effects against cognitive impairments, including working memory, in patients who have undergone brain tumor resection [35] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%