Data Management in the Modern Structural Biology and Biomedical Research Environment

Abstract

Modern high-throughput structural biology laboratories produce vast amounts of raw experimental data. The traditional method of data reduction is very simple—results are summarized in peer-reviewed publications, which are hopefully published in high-impact journals. By their nature, publications include only the most important results derived from experiments that may have been performed over the course of many years. The main content of the published paper is a concise compilation of these data, an interpretation of the experimental results, and a comparison of these results with those obtained by other scientists. Due to an avalanche of structural biology manuscripts submitted to scientific journals, in many recent cases descriptions of experimental methodology (and sometimes even experimental results) are pushed to supplementary materials that are only published online and sometimes may not be reviewed as thoroughly as the main body of a manuscript. Trouble may arise when experimental results are contradicting the results obtained by other scientists, which requires (in the best case) the reexamination of the original raw data or independent repetition of the experiment according to the published description of the experiment. There are reports that a significant fraction of experiments obtained in academic laboratories cannot be repeated in an industrial environment (Begley CG & Ellis LM, Nature 483(7391):531–3, 2012). This is not an indication of scientific fraud but rather reflects the inadequate description of experiments performed on different equipment and on biological samples that were produced with disparate methods. For that reason the goal of a modern data management system is not only the simple replacement of the laboratory notebook by an electronic one but also the creation of a sophisticated, internally consistent, scalable data management system that will combine data obtained by a variety of experiments performed by various individuals on diverse equipment. All data should be stored in a core database that can be used by custom applications to prepare internal reports, statistics, and perform other functions that are specific to the research that is pursued in a particular laboratory. This chapter presents a general overview of the methods of data management and analysis used by structural genomics (SG) programs. In addition to a review of the existing literature on the subject, also presented is experience in the development of two SG data management systems, UniTrack and LabDB. The description is targeted to a general audience, as some technical details have been (or will be) published elsewhere. The focus is on “data management,” meaning the process of gathering, organizing, and storing data, but also briefly discussed is “data mining,” the process of analysis ideally leading to an understanding of the data. In other words, data mining is the conversion of data into information. Clearly, effective data management is a precondition for any useful data mining. If done properly, gathering det...

The impact of structural genomics: the first quindecennial

“…For example, the Structural Genomics Center (SGC) and the Center for Structural Genomics of Infectious Diseases (CSGID) have developed tools to generate interactive electronic presentations making use of ActiveICM technology (Molsoft LLC). In the case of CSGID these presentations are generated semi-automatically [68]. …”

“…Procedures used by laboratories involved in SG, relying on databases [68] and related tools have been successfully used in identifying problems that may affect reproducibility of experimental results, e.g. mislabeling of a protein sample, contamination with a foreign protein, and other issues [76].…”

Review of Developments in Electronic, Clinical Data Collection, and Documentation Systems over the Last Decade – Are We Ready for Big Data in Routine Health Care?

“…With the Big Data challenge, emerging data mining is a buzzword becoming more and more widespread, which is also reflected in recent articles in documentation and management systems (13–15). …”

“…Here, numerous calculations are executed and massive amounts of data arise; hence, systemic data storage and management are essential. Many groups present their research environment, and an increasing interest in developing tools for further analysis can be noticed (13, 29, 30). …”

100 Years later: Celebrating the contributions of x-ray crystallography to allergy and clinical immunology

“…The creation of a ‘big picture’ and better reproducibility will be possible by sophisticated database systems that will organize and analyze structural data in biomedical laboratories. 108 …”