1978
DOI: 10.1097/00002820-197810000-00003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a symptom distress scale

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
435
0
5

Year Published

1996
1996
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 690 publications
(442 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
435
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Although in most studies fatigue was examined as a side effect of chemotherapy [19,27], several studies did report findings similar to this study on pre-treatment fatigue. Cimprich [16] used the Symptom Distress Scale [31] to measure distress symptoms during the pretreatment period of 74 women who were newly diagnosed with breast cancer and found that 90% reported some mood disturbance, 65% reported some loss of concentration, and 77% reported fatigue defined as tiredness. All three of these types of distress are included in the definition of fatigue in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although in most studies fatigue was examined as a side effect of chemotherapy [19,27], several studies did report findings similar to this study on pre-treatment fatigue. Cimprich [16] used the Symptom Distress Scale [31] to measure distress symptoms during the pretreatment period of 74 women who were newly diagnosed with breast cancer and found that 90% reported some mood disturbance, 65% reported some loss of concentration, and 77% reported fatigue defined as tiredness. All three of these types of distress are included in the definition of fatigue in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1) was introduced in 2000, 1 several multisymptom assessment scales, including the Symptom Distress Scale, 5 the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale, 6 the Rotterdam Symptom Checklist, 7 and the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System, 8 were already in use among patients with cancer in Western countries. The MDASI, however, has several advantages over these other tools.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondary endpoints included RBC transfusion requirements, adverse events (AEs), and Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs). PROs were measured using several validated tools: the Symptom Distress Scale (SDS) [18], Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) [19], Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Anemia (FACT-An) [20], and Linear Analog Self Assessment (LASA) [21]. Adverse events were reported using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 3.0.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%