2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10608-018-9914-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic Features of Nonverbal Synchrony in Psychotherapy: Comparing Depression and Anxiety

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
42
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
4
42
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The cross correlation function (CCF) was averaged across windows, and the maximal correlation was used as the synchrony index level (for a similar approach, see Bar‐Kalifa et al, 2019). These parameters (duration of windows; maximum value of correlation) were in line with those suggested by Altmann et al (2019), while the numeric quantification of synchrony followed the steps described in Paulick, Deisenhofer, et al (2018) and Paulick, Rubel, et al (2018), based on cross‐correlation.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The cross correlation function (CCF) was averaged across windows, and the maximal correlation was used as the synchrony index level (for a similar approach, see Bar‐Kalifa et al, 2019). These parameters (duration of windows; maximum value of correlation) were in line with those suggested by Altmann et al (2019), while the numeric quantification of synchrony followed the steps described in Paulick, Deisenhofer, et al (2018) and Paulick, Rubel, et al (2018), based on cross‐correlation.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…While some studies have examined neurophysiological measures such as EEG, this is not an area that has been widely explored in the psychotherapeutic context (Stratford et al 2012). In studies that examined physiological coordination over time, no clear pattern across studies was identified except that the strength of the coordination changes both within and across sessions (Di Mascio et al 1955;Stratford et al 2012Stratford et al , 2014 and that coordination levels in early sessions may be related to diagnoses (Paulick et al 2018b), symptom reduction (Borelli et al 2019), and dropout (Paulick et al 2018a). Further, physiological coordination was primarily linked to measures of empathy and emotion (Marci et al 2007;Marci and Orr 2006;Messina et al 2013) with no direct links between physiological coordination and psychotherapy outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the existing literature on nonverbal synchrony suggests that an increase of synchrony is associated with better relationship quality (Ramseyer & Tschacher, ), positive affect (Tschacher et al , ), and appears to be linked with dyads characterized by high affiliative complementarity (Lozza et al , ). Other studies failed to find clear associations with affect (Paxton & Dale, ) or indicated that an optimal level of synchrony would lie somewhere in between the extremes of low versus high synchrony (Paulick, Deisenhofer et al , ), and that synchrony was dependent on patient's diagnosis (Paulick, Rubel et al , ). In the present sample, synchrony was importantly influenced by inOT/PL, diagnosis, and self‐reported childhood trauma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%