2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0306-4522(02)00292-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential cortical acetylcholine release in rats performing a sustained attention task versus behavioral control tasks that do not explicitly tax attention

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
111
1
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 160 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
7
111
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the effects of repeated AMPH exposure and AMPH-challenge on ACh release did not differ between the two collections taken before task onset and the four collections taken during task performance (see Figure 4). Similar to the results from previous experiments (Arnold et al, 2002;Himmelheber et al, 2000;Kozak et al, 2006), performance of the attention task increased ACh release in the mPFC over baseline. In SAL/SAL animals, ACh release increased by 158.28718.49% over basal ACh levels during the performance of the task (F(1,6) ¼ 66.98; po0.001; see Figure 4).…”
Section: Effects Of Repeated Amph On Ach Release In Performing Ratssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, the effects of repeated AMPH exposure and AMPH-challenge on ACh release did not differ between the two collections taken before task onset and the four collections taken during task performance (see Figure 4). Similar to the results from previous experiments (Arnold et al, 2002;Himmelheber et al, 2000;Kozak et al, 2006), performance of the attention task increased ACh release in the mPFC over baseline. In SAL/SAL animals, ACh release increased by 158.28718.49% over basal ACh levels during the performance of the task (F(1,6) ¼ 66.98; po0.001; see Figure 4).…”
Section: Effects Of Repeated Amph On Ach Release In Performing Ratssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…For example, cortical ACh release in rats performing a fixed interval 9 s schedule of reinforcement increased only by about 50% over baseline, despite a lever-pressing rate that was almost 10-fold the rate observed in sustained attention task-performing rats (Arnold et al, 2002). Likewise, operant procedures controlling for the effects of reward rate and the sensory effects of stimuli indicated that these variables do not account for the increases in ACh release observed in attentional task-performing rats (Dalley et al, 2001;Himmelheber et al, 1997).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The blockade of ionotropic glutamate receptors situated in the region containing the cell bodies of the cholinergic neurons projecting to the cortex produced little effect on basal cortical ACh release but, as would be expected, attenuated the increases in release that are normally produced by a simple conditioned cue eliciting behavioral activation and orientation (Fadel et al, 2001). Contrasting effects on release were found in animals performing a task, which taxes attentional functions and is known to depend on the integrity and activity of the cortical cholinergic input system (Arnold et al, 2002;McGaughy et al, 1996). Specifically, in task-performing animals, blockade of these same ionotropic glutamate receptors resulted in the augmentation of the increases in transmitter release normally observed as a function of task performance (Kozak et al, 2006a).…”
Section: Neurotransmitter Dysregulation In Recruited Circuits: the Simentioning
confidence: 69%
“…The dynamics of cholinergic signalling in the cortex during ongoing behaviour has long remained enigmatic. Due to low temporal resolution of classical techniques such as microdialysis, cholinergic modulation was considered to occur on a timescale of minutes [11,58]. However, recently it was shown that cholinergic signalling involved in attention has a much faster temporal dynamics,…”
Section: Nicotine's Modes Of Actionmentioning
confidence: 99%