2009
DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.3189-09.2009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disruption of Functional Connectivity in Clinically Normal Older Adults Harboring Amyloid Burden

Abstract: Amyloid deposition is present in 20 -50% of nondemented older adults yet the functional consequences remain unclear. The current study found that amyloid accumulation is correlated with functional disruption of the default network as measured by intrinsic activity correlations. Clinically normal participants (n ϭ 38, aged 60 -88 years) were characterized using 11 C-labeled Pittsburgh Compound B positron emission tomography imaging to estimate fibrillar amyloid burden and, separately, underwent functional magne… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

46
425
3
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 518 publications
(476 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
(94 reference statements)
46
425
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies have found that the reduction of DN activity during externally-driven cognitive tasks is less pronounced in old adults, relative to young adults 58,[105][106][107][108][109][110][111][112] . Functional connectivity of the DN also is reduced with age during working memory tasks 113 and during periods of rest 105,[114][115][116] . These reductions in task-related deactivation and functional connectivity are seen in the two regions thought to be the major nodes of the DN, the posterior cingulate cortex (PCC) and ventromedial PFC 117 , as well as in other DN regions, such as the MTL and inferior parietal lobes (see Figure 3).…”
Section: Box 1 Measuring Activity In Brain Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have found that the reduction of DN activity during externally-driven cognitive tasks is less pronounced in old adults, relative to young adults 58,[105][106][107][108][109][110][111][112] . Functional connectivity of the DN also is reduced with age during working memory tasks 113 and during periods of rest 105,[114][115][116] . These reductions in task-related deactivation and functional connectivity are seen in the two regions thought to be the major nodes of the DN, the posterior cingulate cortex (PCC) and ventromedial PFC 117 , as well as in other DN regions, such as the MTL and inferior parietal lobes (see Figure 3).…”
Section: Box 1 Measuring Activity In Brain Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aβ disrupts synaptic functioning, resulting in aberrant brain connectivity at the synaptic level (Selkoe, 2002; Spires‐Jones & Hyman, 2014), as well as on the whole‐brain connectivity level (Delbeuck, der Linden, & Collette, 2003; Hedden et al., 2009). Although the precise sequence of events caused by Aβ plaques is still being investigated (Altmann, Ng, Landau, Jagust, & Greicius, 2015) and interactions with other agents recognized (Jones et al., 2017), the key role of Aβ in AD pathology is beyond doubt (Jack et al., 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The default mode network (DMN) and other resting‐state networks, that is, regions with synchronized fMRI activity, have been studied as markers for AD progression (Binnewijzend et al., 2012; Filippini et al., 2009; Sheline et al., 2010). Functional brain connectivity changes in healthy adults are related to amyloid depositions (Hedden et al., 2009; Sperling et al., 2009), and carriers of the APOE‐ε4 allele show increased co‐activation with the DMN in young adults (Bookheimer et al., 2000; Filippini et al., 2009), indicating that functional connectivity is sensitive to AD‐related alterations of the brain. This study extends these previous findings, using a large sample from a population imaging study, combined with comprehensive AD‐related cognitive assessment and genotyping.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rs-fMRI family of techniques (Biswal et al, 1995;Fox and Greicius, 2010;Hedden et al, 2009;van Dijk et al, 2010) is commonly used to capture intrinsic brain activity. However, the rs-fMRI signal also encompasses substantial non-neural contributions (Biswal and Kannurpatti, 2009;Biswal et al, 2007;Tong and Frederick, 2010), notably through intrinsic physiological processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%