2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0166-4328(01)00202-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of intralaminar thalamic lesions on sensory attention and motor intention in the rat: a comparison with lesions involving frontal cortex and hippocampus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
51
1
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
8
51
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The measured increases in intentional exploratory behavior seen in the stimulated rats can be compared with studies that demonstrate deficits in initiating motor behaviors after CL lesions (31). Importantly, the effects demonstrated above are rewardindependent, indicating that CL stimulation can influence behavior without the use external incentives consistent with a generalized arousal effect producing increase behavioral responsiveness (19,32).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The measured increases in intentional exploratory behavior seen in the stimulated rats can be compared with studies that demonstrate deficits in initiating motor behaviors after CL lesions (31). Importantly, the effects demonstrated above are rewardindependent, indicating that CL stimulation can influence behavior without the use external incentives consistent with a generalized arousal effect producing increase behavioral responsiveness (19,32).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The intralaminar thalamic nuclei have eVerent and afferent connections with the striatum; these connections have been shown to be important in the control of arousal and attention (Mair, Koch, Newman, Howard, & Burk, 2002). Lesions of the IML have been shown to affect striatal-dependent tasks such as the serial reaction time (SRT) task (Burk & Mair, 2001). The SRT task involves the performing of "habitlike" behavioral responses to exterior stimuli.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although one study reported persistent reductions in accuracy on the 5CSRT test following lesions to the temporal hippocampus (made before pretraining), these were accompanied by large increases in perseverative responding, with the number of premature responses not reported (Le Pen et al 2003). Consistent with hippocampal lesions disrupting aspects of inhibitory response control required on the 5CSRT test, rather than sustained attention, complete hippocampal lesions did not affect attentional performance on a prefrontal-dependent self-paced serial-reaction task requiring little impulse control (Burk and Mair 2001). In contrast, sustained attention is highly dependent on balanced prefrontal activity, with prefrontal lesions (Chudasama and Robbins 2006), functional inhibition (by the GABA-A agonist muscimol) or disinhibition ) all markedly disrupting attention on the 5CSRT test.…”
Section: Attentional Deficitsmentioning
confidence: 95%