2006
DOI: 10.1016/s0079-6123(06)56008-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emotional and semantic networks in visual word processing: insights from ERP studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

31
236
5
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 279 publications
(275 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
31
236
5
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, unlike in most of the previous studies, in which a larger LPC was found for emotional than for neutral words (see the reviews by Citron, 2012;Hajcak et al, 2012;Kissler, Assadollahi, & Herbert, 2006), the emotional verbs elicited a smaller LPC than did the neutral verbs in the present study. The larger LPC elicited by emotional words embedded in sentences has been taken as a reflection of reallocation of attentional resources toward emotional information for emotional evaluation (Hajcak et al, 2012).…”
Section: Emotional Word Processing In Sentencescontrasting
confidence: 94%
“…Moreover, unlike in most of the previous studies, in which a larger LPC was found for emotional than for neutral words (see the reviews by Citron, 2012;Hajcak et al, 2012;Kissler, Assadollahi, & Herbert, 2006), the emotional verbs elicited a smaller LPC than did the neutral verbs in the present study. The larger LPC elicited by emotional words embedded in sentences has been taken as a reflection of reallocation of attentional resources toward emotional information for emotional evaluation (Hajcak et al, 2012).…”
Section: Emotional Word Processing In Sentencescontrasting
confidence: 94%
“…Again, threatening angry faces appear to elicit particularly large LPPs (Schupp et al 2004b). Similar emotion effects are also found for other types of stimuli such as words (Kissler et al 2006(Kissler et al , 2007(Kissler et al , 2009, gestures (Flaisch et al 2011), or pictures (Junghöfer et al 2001;Schupp et al 2004a). In general, early emotion effects in vision are thought to reflect emotionally motivated selective attention and perceptual tagging (Schupp et al 2003(Schupp et al , 2004b, whereas effects in the LPP window reflect explicit stimulus evaluation and memory processing (Schupp et al 2003(Schupp et al , 2004b.…”
Section: Emotional Face Perceptionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Differences were evident at both behavioral and electrophysiological levels and indicated that affective information modulated the processing of pictures and had little influence in word processing. Several authors have previously suggested that stimuli that are relevant from a biological point of view, such as emotional images, are capable of inducing higher amounts of physiological arousal in the viewer than are verbal emotional material whose emotional meaning is acquired by learning (Keil, 2006;Kissler et al, 2006;Mogg & Bradley, 1998;Vanderploeg et al, 1987). However, such a suggestion has been based mainly on indirect data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%