2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2006.12.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Error-related event-related potentials in children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, oppositional defiant disorder, reading disorder, and math disorder

Abstract: We studied Error-Related Negativity (ERN) and Error Positivity (Pe) during a discrimination task in 319 unmedicated children divided into subtypes of ADHD (Not-ADHD/ Inattentive/ Combined), Learning Disorder (Not-LD/Reading/Math/Reading+Math), and Oppositional Defiant Disorder. Response-locked ERPs contained a frontocentral ERN and posterior Pe. Error-related Negativity and Positivity exhibited larger amplitude and later latency than corresponding waves for correct responses matched on reaction time. ADHD did … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
69
1
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
(107 reference statements)
12
69
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…During a visual oddball task children with AD/HDcom, but not AD/HDin, unexpectedly showed larger ERN than controls, suggesting that they were more sensitive to the detection of errors, or more emotionally reactive to errors, in this simple task; Pe amplitude did not show group effects for either subtype (Burgio-Murphy et al, 2007). During a feedback-based learning task, medicationnaive children with AD/HDcom showed decreased ERN and Pe to errors, suggesting problems with early detection and later awareness of errors (Groen et al, 2008).…”
Section: Performance Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…During a visual oddball task children with AD/HDcom, but not AD/HDin, unexpectedly showed larger ERN than controls, suggesting that they were more sensitive to the detection of errors, or more emotionally reactive to errors, in this simple task; Pe amplitude did not show group effects for either subtype (Burgio-Murphy et al, 2007). During a feedback-based learning task, medicationnaive children with AD/HDcom showed decreased ERN and Pe to errors, suggesting problems with early detection and later awareness of errors (Groen et al, 2008).…”
Section: Performance Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Kratz et al, 2011), while others appropriately compared subtype groups (e.g. Burgio-Murphy et al, 2007). Another issue is the use of ICD-10 (which does not make the distinction between subtypes) for diagnosis, often with the diagnosis of hyperkinetic disorder (HD) reported as "concordant with DSM-IV AD/HD combined type" (e.g.…”
Section: Progress Since Last Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there are also studies that did not find Pe differences between persons with and without ADHD (Albrecht et al, 2008;Burgio-Murphy et al, 2007;McLoughlin et al, 2009;Wild-Wall et al, 2009). With respect to the Ne, results have been far less consistent: the Ne amplitude has been found to be normal (Jonkman, van Melis, Kemner, & Markus, 2007;O'Connell et al, 2009;Wiersema et al, 2005;Wiersema, van der Meere, & Roeyers, 2009;Wild-Wall, Oades, Schmidt-Wessels, Christiansen, & Falkenstein, 2009;Zhang et al, 2009), reduced (Albrecht et al, 2008;Groen et al, 2008;Liotti, Pliszka, Perez, Kothmann, & Woldorff, 2005;McLoughlin et al, 2009;van Meel, Heslenfeld, Oosterlaan, & Sergeant, 2007), or even enhanced (Burgio-Murphy et al, 2007) in patients with ADHD. Thus, the ERP results generally suggest that children and adults with ADHD have problems with error monitoring with the most consistent finding of a 7 reduced Pe amplitude, implying aberrant conscious evaluation of errors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…However, since a comparable inaccurate response style in some neuropsychological tasks has also been reported in RD (e.g., Burgio-Murphy et al, 2007;Van De Voorde et al, in press), it is important to investigate the role of problems with error monitoring as a possible underlying factor. In everyday life, children with RD continue to make decoding/reading errors despite intensive remedial therapy on top of the normal reading instruction at school (Lyon, Shaywitz, & Shaywitz, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ERN was defined as the lower negative response between 50-300 milliseconds (ms) after stimuli in Fz location EEG band-pass filtering was performed between 0.5-30 Hz. Information from each stimuli was obtained 400 ms before and 500 ms after 8 . Wrong responses were separated from hits and were separately analyzed.…”
Section: Error-related Negativity (Ern)mentioning
confidence: 99%