2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2014.03.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating performance of biomedical image retrieval systems—An overview of the medical image retrieval task at ImageCLEF 2004–2013

Abstract: Medical image retrieval and classification have been extremely active research topics over the past 15 years. With the ImageCLEF benchmark in medical image retrieval and classification a standard test bed was created that allows researchers to compare their approaches and ideas on increasingly large and varied data sets including generated ground truth. This article describes the lessons learned in ten evaluations campaigns. A detailed analysis of the data also highlights the value of the resources created.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
71
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
71
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The medical task has run at ImageCLEF since 2004, with many changes between different editions [6]. The underlying objective of this challenge is the retrieval of similar images to fulfill a precise information need and image classification.…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The medical task has run at ImageCLEF since 2004, with many changes between different editions [6]. The underlying objective of this challenge is the retrieval of similar images to fulfill a precise information need and image classification.…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evaluation campaigns have enabled the reproducible and comparative evaluation of new approaches, algorithms, theories and models through the use of standardized resources and common evaluation methodologies within regular and systematic evaluation cycles. The tasks organized over the years by Image-CLEF 1 [6] have provided an evaluation forum and framework for evaluating the state of the art in biomedical image retrieval.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kajian oleh Kalpathy-Cramer et al menyatakan ketepatan keputusan dapatan semula imej boleh dicapai dengan bantuan teknik-teknik yang digunakan oleh CADS (Kalpathy-Cramer et al 2015). Selain membantu dalam proses diagnosis, sistem DSI juga bertujuan untuk membantu pakar radiologi dengan memberikan maklumat yang sesuai (Ahad et al 2011) dan berkaitan kes yang sedang dirawat.…”
unclassified
“…Now it is getting easier to access data collections but it is still hard to obtain annotated data with a clear evaluation scenario and strong baselines to compare to. Motivated by this, ImageCLEF has for 15 years been an initiative that aims at evaluating multilingual or language independent annotation and retrieval of images [15,18,5,24]. The main goal of ImageCLEF is to support the advancement of the field of visual media analysis, classification, annotation, indexing and retrieval.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%