2015
DOI: 10.1093/biosci/biv081
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Food Spoilage, Storage, and Transport: Implications for a Sustainable Future

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
57
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The average temperature difference was 0.7 ± 0.3°C for fluorescent and 0.8 ± 0.3°C for LED illumination. These fluctuations brought about an overall temperature increase, likely to affect spoilage kinetics . The average temperature of the potato slice samples stored in the dark was 7.6 ± 0.2°C.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The average temperature difference was 0.7 ± 0.3°C for fluorescent and 0.8 ± 0.3°C for LED illumination. These fluctuations brought about an overall temperature increase, likely to affect spoilage kinetics . The average temperature of the potato slice samples stored in the dark was 7.6 ± 0.2°C.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The average temperature difference was 0.7 ± 0.3 C for fluorescent and 0.8 ± 0.3 C for LED illumination. These fluctuations brought about an overall temperature increase, likely to affect spoilage kinetics 35. The average temperature of the potato slice samples stored in the dark was 7.6 ± 0.2 C. Samples stored in LED light had an average temperature of 6.9 ± 0.5 C, and samples stored in fluorescent light had an average temperature of 8.5 ± 0.4 C. A momentary temperature peak at about 180 hours of storage was due to a temporary power cut.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some prominent storage systems are canning, freezing, freeze-drying, vacuum packing, storage in gases, drying etc. (Hammond et al 2015). Finally, the researchers suggest that new additional studies need to be undertaken to validate or reject the overall findings of the current study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spoilage of food incurs huge economic losses to producers (farmers), retailers, and consumers (Snyder, & Worobo, ). Storage temperature (Mageswari, Subramanian, Srinivasan, Karthikeyan, & Gothandam, ; Ndraha, Hsiao, Vlajic, Yang, & Lin, ; Odeyemi, Burke, Bolch, & Stanley, ), pH, water availability or moisture, improper storage (Bradford et al., ), indigenous microflora such as bacteria and fungi (Ioannidis et al., ), processing operations (Wang, He, & Yang, ), transportation (Hammond et al., ), and food handlers all influence the rate of spoilage. Aside from the problems of food insecurity and economic loss (Illikoud et al., ), spoiled food also contributes to food waste, which is another global environmental problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%