2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaac.2016.05.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional Connectivity of the Amygdala Is Disrupted in Preschool-Aged Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder

Abstract: Objective The objective of the current study was to determine whether functional connectivity of the amygdala is altered in preschool-aged children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and to assess the clinical relevance of observed alterations in amygdala connectivity. Method We conducted a resting-state functional connectivity magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) study of the amygdala (and a parallel study of primary visual cortex) in 72 male children (mean age: 3.5 years; n=43 with ASD; n=29 age-matched contr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

9
66
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
(66 reference statements)
9
66
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Seed-based, resting-state functional connectivity between the amygdala and canonical targets is reduced in preschool-aged children with ASD (Shen et al, 2016), consistent with what might be expected given increased amygdala volumes and atypical FA in limbic regions such as the uncinate and the inferior longitudinal fasciculi (Conti et al, 2017; Solso et al, 2016; Wolff et al, 2012; Xiao et al, 2014). A series of studies from Courchesne et al also indicates atypical connectivity in language areas, patterns of which have been associated with measures of receptive and expressive language function (Dinstein et al, 2011; Eyler et al, 2012; Lombardo et al, 2015; Redcay & Courchesne, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Seed-based, resting-state functional connectivity between the amygdala and canonical targets is reduced in preschool-aged children with ASD (Shen et al, 2016), consistent with what might be expected given increased amygdala volumes and atypical FA in limbic regions such as the uncinate and the inferior longitudinal fasciculi (Conti et al, 2017; Solso et al, 2016; Wolff et al, 2012; Xiao et al, 2014). A series of studies from Courchesne et al also indicates atypical connectivity in language areas, patterns of which have been associated with measures of receptive and expressive language function (Dinstein et al, 2011; Eyler et al, 2012; Lombardo et al, 2015; Redcay & Courchesne, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Findings from Shen et al (2016) concerning diminished cortical and subcortical amygdala connectivity compliment neuroimaging reports of atypical amygdala structure among young preschool-aged children (Mosconi et al, 2009; Munson et al, 2006; Schumann et al, 2009). Evidence that whole-brain functional connectivity patterns could serve as a sensitive and specific presymptomatic biomarker of autism in high-risk sibs will very likely catalyze future work.…”
Section: Auditory-evoked and Resting-state Fmrisupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Amygdala volume of children with ASD is significantly larger than in typically developing children (Sparks et al, ; Schumann et al, ; Mosconi et al, ; Kim et al, ; Nordahl et al, ). This relative overgrowth correlates with symptom severity, providing further evidence for the structure–function relationship of the amygdala in ASD (Munson et al, ; Mosconi et al, ; Schumann, Barnes, Lord, & Courchesne, ; Iidaka, Miyakoshi, Harada, & Nakai, ; Elison et al, ; Shen et al, ). However, the volume difference in ASD dissipates during adolescence as the amygdala continues to grow in TD (Schumann et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, increased plasticity in the circuits responsible for fear-learning may underpin the pathophysiology of anxiety disorders in FXS and ASDs in early life. However, anxiety and fear-related disorders in FXS and ASDs in later life may be mediated by other mechanisms including changes in brain-wide functional connectivity (Haberl et al , 2015; Shen et al , 2016) or changes in neuromodulation (Hessl et al , 2002; Ghilan et al , 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%