2008
DOI: 10.1002/art.24132
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inflammatory lesions of the spine on magnetic resonance imaging predict the development of new syndesmophytes in ankylosing spondylitis: Evidence of a relationship between inflammation and new bone formation

Abstract: Objective. To determine whether a vertebral corner that demonstrates an active corner inflammatory lesion (CIL) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is more likely to evolve into a de novo syndesmophyte visible on plain radiography than is a vertebral corner that demonstrates no active inflammation on MRI.Methods. MRI scans and plain radiographs were obtained for 29 patients recruited into randomized placebo-controlled trials of anti-tumor necrosis factor ␣ (anti-TNF… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

9
185
7
17

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 319 publications
(218 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
9
185
7
17
Order By: Relevance
“…The MR images were read independently by readers who recorded the presence/absence of vertebral corner fat and/or inflammation at the anterior vertebral corners of the cervical (lower part of C2 to upper part of T1) and lumbar (lower part of T12 to upper part of S1) spine. None of the T1-weighted images from scans of these 100 patients had been assessed previously, whereas STIR sequence images from 70 patients had been assessed for a previously reported study (12).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The MR images were read independently by readers who recorded the presence/absence of vertebral corner fat and/or inflammation at the anterior vertebral corners of the cervical (lower part of C2 to upper part of T1) and lumbar (lower part of T12 to upper part of S1) spine. None of the T1-weighted images from scans of these 100 patients had been assessed previously, whereas STIR sequence images from 70 patients had been assessed for a previously reported study (12).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vertebral corner fat infiltration and inflammatory lesions are often subtle and are confounded by phase-encoding artifacts, which are typically worse in the anterior lumbar spine, and limited spatial resolution in the cervical spine, where vertebrae are small and the field of view is comparatively large. We have previously reported that vertebral corner inflammatory lesions are associated with the development of new syndesmophytes after 2 years of followup (12). Consequently, the primary analysis was a comparison of the proportion of new syndesmophytes developing at each anterior vertebral corner where fat infiltration, but not inflammation, was recorded by both readers as being present at the baseline examination versus vertebral corners where neither of the two readers recorded either fat infiltration or inflammation at baseline.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Other possible explanations are the fact that new bone formation is a late consequence of inflammation and thus may have a long lag time to see effect, the possibility of low grade ongoing inflammation even in those with clinical improvement on TNFα blocking therapy and the suggestion that TNFα, in the presence of active inflammation, reduces new bone formation. Thus once inflammation improves on TNFα blocking treatment, the "brake" is released and repair and new bone formation can proceed [13]. This possible link with inflammation is supported by a recent study suggesting that syndesmophyte formation is more frequent in vertebral corners in which a previous inflammatory lesion has resolved [14].…”
Section: Searching For a Possible Link Between Inflammation And New Bmentioning
confidence: 85%