2010
DOI: 10.1108/17504971011034700
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigating the use of Web 2.0 technology by Malaysian students

Abstract: Purpose -Many research have uncovered the use of Web 2.0 technology by students from various countries. Yet, limited studies have been done from the context of developing country such as Malaysia. This paper aims to highlight the development of a survey instrument that captured the use of Web 2.0 applications by Malaysian students for learning. Design/methodology/approach -Surveys had been used by most studies to gather empirical evidence about the use of Web 2.0 by young generations. The paper discussed how p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They claimed that the features of Facebook helped to engage students in meaningful language-based activities and had the potential to enhance student interaction to improve their command of the language being studied. From a broader perspective, Zakaria et al (2010) who conducted a survey of 250 undergraduate students in one Malaysian university discovered that in general, students in the country were well exposed to these social technologies and were comfortable in using them for educational purposes. The study further indicates that the students established better engagement and interaction with the course and their peers, but minimal interactions with their lecturers (Zakaria et al, 2010).…”
Section: Evaluations Of Social Technologies In Specific Learning Settmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They claimed that the features of Facebook helped to engage students in meaningful language-based activities and had the potential to enhance student interaction to improve their command of the language being studied. From a broader perspective, Zakaria et al (2010) who conducted a survey of 250 undergraduate students in one Malaysian university discovered that in general, students in the country were well exposed to these social technologies and were comfortable in using them for educational purposes. The study further indicates that the students established better engagement and interaction with the course and their peers, but minimal interactions with their lecturers (Zakaria et al, 2010).…”
Section: Evaluations Of Social Technologies In Specific Learning Settmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most important advantage of Web 2.0 tools is that it encourages two ways interactions among students and lecturers beyond the classroom hours. Adoption and uses of social media and other web 2.0 tools for social interactions is growing among people of different ages [14] but its adoption and use by college students and staffs is still very low [2] [4] and [15]. However precautions should be taken when comparing those results.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many previous researches investigated the use of web 2.0 technology found that the level of awareness of web 2.0 technology is high, [15] and [9] However the high level of awareness of web 2.0 tools does not match with the extent of their use especially for creation and sharing of academic knowledge, [9]. This indicates that Web 2.0 tools are not utilized to their full potentials to enhance knowledge sharing among students and lecturers in higher education.…”
Section: The Research Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last few years, there has been much discussion about the use of social technologies in higher education (Bayne & Ross, 2007;Hemmi, Bayne, & Land, 2009;Shaohua & Peilin, 2008;Zakaria, Watson, & Edwards, 2010). This is illustrated through published examples of successful uses of social technologies in the extant literature (Ajjan & Hartshorne, 2008;Dale & Pymm, 2009;Hemmi, et al, 2009).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%