2012
DOI: 10.1109/tmi.2011.2166083
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Joint Modeling of Anatomical and Functional Connectivity for Population Studies

Abstract: We propose a novel probabilistic framework to merge information from diffusion weighted imaging tractography and resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging correlations to identify connectivity patterns in the brain. In particular, we model the interaction between latent anatomical and functional connectivity and present an intuitive extension to population studies. We employ the EM algorithm to estimate the model parameters by maximizing the data likelihood. The method simultaneously infers the templ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
43
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We divided the brain into P parcels (P set to 500) to enable finer brain partitioning than facilitated by standard brain atlases (typically P < 150). This choice of P provides a balance between functional localization and robustness to subject variability in tractography [7]. Parcellation was performed by concatenating RS-fMRI time courses across subjects and applying Ward clustering [15].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We divided the brain into P parcels (P set to 500) to enable finer brain partitioning than facilitated by standard brain atlases (typically P < 150). This choice of P provides a balance between functional localization and robustness to subject variability in tractography [7]. Parcellation was performed by concatenating RS-fMRI time courses across subjects and applying Ward clustering [15].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To exploit the joint information in dMRI and fMRI data, variants of ICA and canonical correlation analysis [6] have been proposed for identifying brain areas that display high correlations between anatomical and functional attributes, such as fractional anisotropy and activation effects. Recently, a probabilistic model has been put forth for combining dMRI and fMRI data in detecting group differences in brain connection structure [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of past studies [1][2][3][4] reported a strong agreement between AC and FC, as estimated from tractography-based measures such as fiber counts and temporal correlations between RS-fMRI time courses, respectively. These findings incited new research directions, such as integrating dMRI and RS-fMRI data for multimodal connectivity estimation [5,6] and informing fMRI activation detection with AC priors [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the early work focused on direct comparisons of structural and functional connectivity information learned separately from dMRI and fMRI data [8,9]. More recently, merits of multi-modal integration for joint anatomical and functional connectivity inference have been explored [10][11][12]. Promising results in these studies indicate benefits of multi-modal integration though the scope of this strategy has mostly been limited to connectivity estimation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%