2019
DOI: 10.1108/ijlss-05-2017-0051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lean management approach in hospitals: a systematic review

Abstract: Purpose In the recent few years, the Lean management has made significant improvements in providing quality service to patients in many health-care centers. Thus, this study aims to systematically review features and results of conducted studies using a lean management approach in hospitals. Design/methodology/approach In this systematic review, eight databases, including PubMed, Web of Knowledge, Google Scholar, Scopus, Iranmedex, SID, Magiran and Medlib, were searched using keywords including “Lean princip… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Other indicators related to patient are health/clinical outcomes (considered in 12 reviews), such as: a reduction in mortality rate (D'Andreamatteo et al , 2015; Ferreira et al , 2018; Hallam and Contreras, 2018; Mazzocato et al , 2010; Mousavi Isfahani et al , 2019; Abdallah and Alkhaldi, 2019); the effectiveness of care (three reviews) (Abdallah and Alkhaldi, 2019; Crema and Verbano, 2013, 2017); increased capacity (increasing the provision of services or the number of patients who can be adequately serviced without sacrificing other measures, such as patient safety, quality of care, and so forth) (three reviews) (Costa and Godinho Filho, 2016; Crema and Verbano, 2015; Parkhi, 2019); the appropriateness of treatment (two reviews) (Abdallah and Alkhaldi, 2019; Crema and Verbano, 2017); improved accessibility (two reviews) (D'Andreamatteo et al , 2015; Poksinska, 2010); and infection reduction (Deblois and Lepanto, 2016).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other indicators related to patient are health/clinical outcomes (considered in 12 reviews), such as: a reduction in mortality rate (D'Andreamatteo et al , 2015; Ferreira et al , 2018; Hallam and Contreras, 2018; Mazzocato et al , 2010; Mousavi Isfahani et al , 2019; Abdallah and Alkhaldi, 2019); the effectiveness of care (three reviews) (Abdallah and Alkhaldi, 2019; Crema and Verbano, 2013, 2017); increased capacity (increasing the provision of services or the number of patients who can be adequately serviced without sacrificing other measures, such as patient safety, quality of care, and so forth) (three reviews) (Costa and Godinho Filho, 2016; Crema and Verbano, 2015; Parkhi, 2019); the appropriateness of treatment (two reviews) (Abdallah and Alkhaldi, 2019; Crema and Verbano, 2017); improved accessibility (two reviews) (D'Andreamatteo et al , 2015; Poksinska, 2010); and infection reduction (Deblois and Lepanto, 2016).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, this approach, based on the direct immersion experience of the researcher, is particularly interesting when studying organisational transformation processes such as those associated with the implementation and deployment of lean management. According to some authors [10,[24][25][26][27], there are scarce references to adoption of the action research approach in the search for improvements in health services. This is because the literature mainly centres analysis on case studies (e.g., [4,12,13]).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because the literature mainly centres analysis on case studies (e.g., [4,12,13]). Other papers reflect on, synthesize and review the case studies, looking at them in terms of tools, adopted practices or activities, indicators, affected areas or departments as well as the results obtained (e.g., [9][10][11]). In this context, the approach taken by this paper is not so much to describe why lean management is of interest in the health sector but rather to propose how to implement it successfully, using a scientific methodology that can be replicated and applied in other contexts.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results of implementing experience approaches were reflected in the works of (Alexander, Anthony, & Rodgers, 2017;Alkunsol, Sharabati, AlSalhi, & El-Tamimi, 2016, Deamonita, Pujiyanto, & Rosyidi, 2017Nemati, Dave, Sias, & Perkins, 2019;Kȩsek, Bogacz, & Mirza, 2019;Mousavi Isfahani, Tourani, & Seyedin, 2017;Yadav, Mathiyazhagan, & Kumar, 2017;Salam, 2008;Sigrid Nordby, 2017;Messinger, Rogers, & Hawker, 2019) analysis of which highlights one common essential point: the success of the implementation of any approaches depends on strict compliance with the conditions, the assessment of the existence and implementation of which is not subject to formalization, it is subjective, meanwhile underperformance or non-performance of these conditions are inherently flawed as a quality management system project: 1) it should be initiated by top -management of a company;…”
Section: Purpose Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%