2003
DOI: 10.1037/1040-3590.15.4.532
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring Adjustment to Chronic Skin Disorders: Validation of a Self-Report Measure.

Abstract: This article describes the development of a questionnaire that assesses problems in adapting to chronic skin disorders, the Adjustment to Chronic Skin Diseases Questionnaire. Patients (N = 442) with different skin disorders completed the original item pool. Principal-components analysis suggested a 6-factor solution that was largely replicated with 2 additional samples of 192 patients with psoriasis or atopic dermatitis and 165 patients with atopic dermatitis. Four of the subscales showed very good internal co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
98
1
7

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(58 reference statements)
2
98
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, in various (not necessarily CP-related) skin diseases, women suffer from greater social anxiety, helplessness, depression and stigmatization than men [31]. Although female gender was associated with lower HRQoL, we could not identify a significant impact of the type of skin lesions or the examined disease category in relation to gender.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 46%
“…Moreover, in various (not necessarily CP-related) skin diseases, women suffer from greater social anxiety, helplessness, depression and stigmatization than men [31]. Although female gender was associated with lower HRQoL, we could not identify a significant impact of the type of skin lesions or the examined disease category in relation to gender.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 46%
“…The set of dependent variables included: (1) patient characteristics: age, sex, educational status; (2) medical and biological predictors assessed before treatment: intensity of scratching (11-point scale), use of antihistaminics (number per month), serum IgE level (<100 IU/ml = low level, 100–1,000 IU/ml = medium level, >1,000 IU/ml = high level; radioimmunoassay test Enzygnost IgE, Pharmacia Behring, Marburg, Germany), age of onset, duration of disease, family incidence of atopic diseases, comorbidity with asthma, comorbidity with hay fever, occurrence of contact allergy, occurrence of food allergy; (3) psychological predictors assessed before treatment: coping with itching, catastrophizing related to itching: subscales of the questionnaire on itch-related cognitions [24]; social anxiety/avoidance, itch-scratch circle, helplessness, anxious-depressive mood: subscales of the questionnaire on the adjustment to chronic skin disorders [25]; trait-anxiety subscale of the Spielberger State-Trait-Anxiety Inventory [26, 27]; depressive mood: Center for Epidemiological Studies for Depression Scale [28, 29]; internal, personal external and fatalistic external Health Locus of Control (HLC) Scales [30, 31]; patients’ rating of the therapists’ behavior including the subscales sympathy, experience and directiveness [32]; genetic, somatic and psychological causal attributions of disease (ratings of agreement on 5-point scales), and general psychological distress using a total of 18 items referring to different life domains (5-point distress scale).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aspecten van jeukkrab-problematiek of ervaren stigmatisatie worden weer met afzonderlijke vragenlijsten in kaart gebracht (Ehlers, Stangier, Dohn & Gieler., 1993, Leary et al,. 1998Stangier, Ehlers & Gieler, 2003). Er is dan ook geen instrument voor handen dat verschillende ziektespecifieke en generieke aspecten in kaart brengt.…”
Section: Inleidingunclassified