2015
DOI: 10.1177/0163278715588927
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring Self-Care in Persons With Type 2 Diabetes

Abstract: This systematic review examines the characteristics and psychometric properties of the instruments used to assess self-care behaviors among persons with type 2 diabetes. Electronic databases were searched for relevant studies published in English within the past 20 years. Thirty different instruments were identified in 75 articles: 18 original instruments on type 2 diabetes mellitus self-care, 8 translated or revised version, and 4 not specific but relevant to diabetes. Twenty-one instruments were multidimensi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
60
0
5

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
0
60
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Given that patients have to cope with the disease and participate in self-care activities, they must be health literate, since individuals with limited training and insufficient health literacy tend to have more difficulties during therapy (4,5) , presenting low adherence to the therapeutic regimen, poor understanding of health problems, lack of self-care knowledge, low use of preventive services, poor general health and morbidity (6,7) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that patients have to cope with the disease and participate in self-care activities, they must be health literate, since individuals with limited training and insufficient health literacy tend to have more difficulties during therapy (4,5) , presenting low adherence to the therapeutic regimen, poor understanding of health problems, lack of self-care knowledge, low use of preventive services, poor general health and morbidity (6,7) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior studies have lacked a theoretical framework [28,29] and therefore self-care of T2DM has not been explored as a dynamic and complex phenomenon with multiple dimensions. Instruments used to measure self-care have not been theoretically based [30,31]. Comorbid conditions have not been addressed as potentially influencing the self-care process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is therefore not surprising that over the last three decades a variety of self-report measures concerning diabetes self-management have been developed. A recent systematic review identified a total of 21 multidimensional scales of overall diabetes self-management plus some additional ones focussing on single self-management domains, originating from various countries [ 8 ]. However, despite this seeming abundance of measurement options, the number of useful and psychometrically satisfactory instruments is indeed limited.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, not all of the tools reviewed in the paper are at all accessible. Out of the 21 scales, only ten were available in English language, and out of those, only five were rated sufficiently validated by the reviewing authors [ 8 ]. This result clearly corresponds to two earlier reviews on the topic which collected a total of five [ 9 ] and seven [ 10 ] self-management scales, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%