2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10552-018-1058-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metformin use and incidence cancer risk: evidence for a selective protective effect against liver cancer

Abstract: In this large cohort study that accounted for time-related biases, we observed no association between the use of metformin and most cancers; however, we found a strong inverse association between metformin and liver cancer. Randomized trials of metformin for prevention of liver cancer would be useful to verify these observations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, sulfonylurea use (OR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.16-2.24) and insulin use (OR, 2.61; 95% CI, 1.46-4.65) were associated with increased HCC incidence. 58 Other recent studies have further confirmed an association between metformin and decreased HCC incidence, 59,60 although uniform assessment of co-existing NASH was not performed in these studies. Metformin and other antidiabetic medications, such as sulfonylureas, insulin, sodiumglucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors, and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors have not demonstrated meaningful improvement in liver histology end points among patients with NAFLD.…”
Section: Best Practice Advice 7: Optimal Management Of Diabetes and Dmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In contrast, sulfonylurea use (OR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.16-2.24) and insulin use (OR, 2.61; 95% CI, 1.46-4.65) were associated with increased HCC incidence. 58 Other recent studies have further confirmed an association between metformin and decreased HCC incidence, 59,60 although uniform assessment of co-existing NASH was not performed in these studies. Metformin and other antidiabetic medications, such as sulfonylureas, insulin, sodiumglucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors, and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors have not demonstrated meaningful improvement in liver histology end points among patients with NAFLD.…”
Section: Best Practice Advice 7: Optimal Management Of Diabetes and Dmentioning
confidence: 94%
“… 18 Murff et al reported the strong inverse association between metformin and liver cancer, but not gastric cancer. 17 Population-based studies in the Netherlands, Sweden and Taiwan also indicated that metformin did not reduce GC risk. 14 , 21 , 23…”
Section: The Efficacy Of Metformin For Gastric Cancer In Clinical Pramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Without specifying the histological subtypes, a limited number of studies have reported conflicting results regarding the association between metformin use and the risk of esophageal cancer (13)(14)(15)(16)23). A case-control study from Taiwan reported an increased risk (odds ratio 2.84, 95% CI 0.99-8.18) (24), while decreased risks were instead found in cohort studies from Taiwan (HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.35-0.68) (13), and the Netherlands (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.82-0.97) (14).…”
Section: Adherence To Metformin Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A case-control study from Taiwan reported an increased risk (odds ratio 2.84, 95% CI 0.99-8.18) (24), while decreased risks were instead found in cohort studies from Taiwan (HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.35-0.68) (13), and the Netherlands (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.82-0.97) (14). Other studies reported no association between metformin use and esophageal cancer risk (15,16,23). The major differences in the findings of the available studies could be explained by differences in the distribution of squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma (and other less common histological types of esophageal cancer), study design, study population, data collection, adjustment for confounders, exposure measurement, comparison groups, and follow-up.…”
Section: Adherence To Metformin Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%