2016
DOI: 10.1002/hbm.23397
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Motion‐related artifacts in structural brain images revealed with independent estimates of in‐scanner head motion

Abstract: Motion‐contaminated T1‐weighted (T1w) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) results in misestimates of brain structure. Because conventional T1w scans are not collected with direct measures of head motion, a practical alternative is needed to identify potential motion‐induced bias in measures of brain anatomy. Head movements during functional MRI (fMRI) scanning of 266 healthy adults (20–89 years) were analyzed to reveal stable features of in‐scanner head motion. The magnitude of head motion increased with age and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
188
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 164 publications
(193 citation statements)
references
References 109 publications
5
188
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, a number of studies have pointed out effects of participant motion on the quality of structural MRI scans, including on estimates of regional morphological measures such as cortical thickness (Reuter et al 2015; Alexander-Bloch et al 2016; Savalia et al 2017). While we have carried out stringent quality control of our structural scans and FreeSurfer reconstructions of cortical thickness (details in Supplementary Information), we cannot completely rule out potential artefactual effects of motion on our results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, a number of studies have pointed out effects of participant motion on the quality of structural MRI scans, including on estimates of regional morphological measures such as cortical thickness (Reuter et al 2015; Alexander-Bloch et al 2016; Savalia et al 2017). While we have carried out stringent quality control of our structural scans and FreeSurfer reconstructions of cortical thickness (details in Supplementary Information), we cannot completely rule out potential artefactual effects of motion on our results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Strong artifacts due to motion, in addition to their relevance for fMRI, have been noted in diffusion weighted imaging (Roalf et al, 2016; Yendiki et al, 2014) and cortical thickness measurements (Reuter et al, 2015; Savalia et al, 2017). Motion artifacts appear to be tightly related to clinical factors (Fair et al, 2012b) and a whole host of behavioral phenotypes and metrics (Siegel et al, 2016).…”
Section: Methodsological Challenges and Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Manual editing and rechecking were completed as needed to account for the inaccuracies in the automated outputs (Savalia et al, 2017). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%