New ways of building, showcasing, and measuring scholarly reputation

Nicholas, David; Herman, Eti; Jamali, Hamid R.; Bravo, Blanca Rodríguez; Boukacem‐Zeghmouri, Chérifa; Dobrowolski, Tom; Pouchot, Stéphanie

doi:10.1087/20150303

Cited by 63 publications

(52 citation statements)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The PhD student reported noticing that other PhD students often use social media as a way to gather information and to build a professional network which was similar to others findings (Lupton, 2014, Nicholas et al 2015.…”

Section: Reported Benefits With Social Media Amongst Interviewed Liu supporting

confidence: 84%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Librarians as Advocates of Social Media for Researchers: A Social Media Project Initiated by Linköping University Library, Sweden

Persson

Svenningsson

2016

New Review of Academic Librarianship

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Reported Benefits With Social Media Amongst Interviewed Liu supporting

confidence: 84%

“…Findings from a small study (Nicholas et al, 2015) suggest that early-career scholars have more to gain by using emerging platforms (eg. ResearchGate/Academia.edu).…”

Section: Early-career Vs Senior-career Researchersmentioning

confidence: 99%

Librarians as Advocates of Social Media for Researchers: A Social Media Project Initiated by Linköping University Library, Sweden

Persson

Svenningsson

2016

New Review of Academic Librarianship

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Nevertheless, there has been a plethora of quantitative, one‐off studies that have examined aspects of scholarly communications change, both of early career and tenured researchers, and the data in this report do, indeed, challenge many of their findings. Thus, it is clear from the literature that the broad consensus is that ECRs have to play by the traditional rules (Sinclair, Barnacle, & Cuthbert, ) in order to obtain a secure research job and, therefore, will blinker themselves to publishing papers in prestigious journals in order to gain a reputation and pass muster with assessment systems (Carpenter, Wetheridge, & Tanner, ; Ivancheva, ; Müller, , ; Nicholas, , Herman, Jamali, et al, ; Nicholas, Jamali, Watkinson, et al, ; Nicholas, Watkinson, Jamali, et al, ). Suppressing their millennial beliefs about openness, sharing, and transparency (Anderson & Rainie, ; Taylor & Keeter, ), they put in cold storage their more encompassing views on reputation (Jamali, Nicholas, & Herman, ).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

So, are early career researchers the harbingers of change?

et al. 2019

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article provides the final results of a 3‐year study that sought to discover whether early career researchers (ECRs) were the harbingers of change with respect to scholarly communications. Over a hundred science and social science ECRs from seven countries, spanning three continents, were depth‐interviewed annually for 3 years (2016–2018) about their attitudes and behaviours with respect to 23 scholarly issues and activities (aspects). In order to provide an accessible overarching assessment of an extremely large and complex dataset, the interview data were categorized according to the strength and direction of change exhibited and the trends and points of interest raised. Results show that all ECRs have changed in one way or another, and a small minority has changed greatly in both attitude and practice and that collaboration and research impact are the scholarly aspects where most changes have occurred, and the greatest cause of change is not so much new technology as a change of jobs.

show abstract

“…The ability to upload and share the full-text of publications is a feature valued by users of ResearchGate and similar academic social networks (Campos-Freire & Rúas-Araújo, 2016;Corvello, Genovese, & Verteramo, 2014;Elsayed, 2015;Laakso et al, 2017;Marra, 2015;Matthews, 2016;Nicholas et al, 2015;Tenopir et al, 2016;Van Noorden, 2014;Wu, Stvilia, & Lee, 2016). This contributes to ResearchGate being a significant source of freely available scholarly content.…”

Section: Researchgatementioning

confidence: 99%

“…edu, which is preferred by researchers in the social sciences and especially the humanities Campos-Freire & Rúas-Araújo, 2016;Elsayed, 2015;Jamali et al, 2016;Matthews, 2016;Mikki et al, 2015;Nández & Borrego, 2013;Ortega, 2015;Thelwall & Kousha, 2015;Thelwall & Kousha, 2017;Van Noorden, 2014 Míguez-González et al, 2017;Mikki et al, 2015;Ortega, 2015;Singh, 2016;Tran & Lyon, 2017;Van Noorden, 2014). Use of ResearchGate is notably higher than that of Academia.edu among senior researchers Matthews, 2016;Mikki et al, 2015).The ability to upload and share the full-text of publications is a feature valued by users of ResearchGate and similar academic social networks (Campos-Freire & Rúas-Araújo, 2016;Corvello, Genovese, & Verteramo, 2014;Elsayed, 2015;Laakso et al, 2017;Marra, 2015;Matthews, 2016;Nicholas et al, 2015;Tenopir et al, 2016;Van Noorden, 2014;Wu, Stvilia, & Lee, 2016). This contributes to ResearchGate being a significant source of freely available scholarly content.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Institutional Repositories and Academic Social Networks: Competition or Complement? A Study of Open Access Policy Compliance vs. ResearchGate Participation

Lovett

Rathemacher

Boukari

et al. 2017

Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

INTRODUCTIONThe popularity of academic social networks like ResearchGate and Academia.edu indicates that scholars want to share their work, yet for universities with open access (OA) policies, these sites may be competing with institutional repositories (IRs) for content. This article seeks to reveal researcher practices, attitudes, and motivations around uploading their work to ResearchGate and complying with an institutional OA Policy through a study of faculty at the University of Rhode Island (URI). METHODS We conducted a population study to examine the participation by 558 full-time URI faculty members in the OA Policy and ResearchGate followed by a survey of 728 full-time URI faculty members about their participation in the two services. DISCUSSION The majority of URI faculty do not participate in the OA Policy or use ResearchGate. Authors' primary motivations for participation are sharing their work more broadly and increasing its visibility and impact. Faculty who participate in ResearchGate are more likely to participate in the OA Policy, and vice versa. The fact that the OA Policy targets the author manuscript and not the final published article constitutes a significant barrier to participation. CONCLUSION Librarians should not view academic social networks as a threat to open access. Authors' strong preference for sharing the final, published version of their articles provides support for calls to hasten the transition to a Gold OA publishing system. Misunderstandings about the OA Policy and copyright indicate a need for librarians to conduct greater education and outreach to authors about options for legally sharing articles. Received: 01/26/2017 Accepted: 06/20/2017 Correspondence: Andrée Rathemacher, 269 Library, University Libraries, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI 02881, USA, andree@uri.edu 2. Throughout the survey, faculty reported a strong aversion to sharing the author manuscript version of their articles. This was the most significant barrier to participating in the OA Policy. This finding, if generalizable, should inform current discussions among OA advocates about the respective roles going forward of Green OA achieved through depositing author manuscripts in institutional repositories and Gold OA achieved at the point of publication. RESEARCH3. Our survey revealed a range of misunderstandings about the IR, OA policies, and copyright. For example, many respondents believe that the legality of posting one's articles in both the IR and ResearchGate depends on publisher policy and the version of the article posted. In fact, permissions-based OA policies make it legal to post author manuscripts in the IR regardless of publisher policies, and many subscriptionaccess journals prohibit depositing any version of an article to commercial sites like ResearchGate. These misunderstandings indicate a need for librarians to conduct greater education and outreach to faculty around their options for legally sharing published articles. INTRODUCTIONFrom electronic journals and repositories to soci...

show abstract

New ways of building, showcasing, and measuring scholarly reputation

Abstract: ABSTRACT. The article reports on a study of the views and actions of nearly a hundred scholars -mostly academic researchers from four European countries and four disciplines -in regard to

Cited by 63 publications

References 9 publications

Librarians as Advocates of Social Media for Researchers: A Social Media Project Initiated by Linköping University Library, Sweden

Librarians as Advocates of Social Media for Researchers: A Social Media Project Initiated by Linköping University Library, Sweden

So, are early career researchers the harbingers of change?

Institutional Repositories and Academic Social Networks: Competition or Complement? A Study of Open Access Policy Compliance vs. ResearchGate Participation

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About