2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.cancergencyto.2009.06.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the karyotypic origin and evolution of cancer cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
51
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
3
51
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…and pipetted with plastic pipette tips onto microscope slides following published procedures. 50,51 Slides with suitable metaphase chromosomes were then hybridized with chromosomespecific, color-coded DNA probes as described by the manufacturer (MetaSystems) and by us previously in references 50 and 51.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…and pipetted with plastic pipette tips onto microscope slides following published procedures. 50,51 Slides with suitable metaphase chromosomes were then hybridized with chromosomespecific, color-coded DNA probes as described by the manufacturer (MetaSystems) and by us previously in references 50 and 51.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since cancers are species with flexible karyotypes, they can generate new subspecies, such as metastases, by spontaneous karyotypic rearrangements, independent of mutation. 17,[47][48][49][50][51][52] This flexibility of cancer karyotypes is a consequence of an equilibrium between two competing forces: (1) inherited imbalances of normal mitosis genes destabilizing cancer karyotypes. These imbalances reflect the very karyotypic rearrangements that generated cancers from normal cells.…”
Section: Origin Of Metastasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Except four abnormal chromosomes [del(2), del(11), t(15;19) and t(3;20)] are found in common, the other ten derived chromosomes: A1[del (1q) (12)] appeared in present study are not found in previous A549 karyotype. As shown previously, many cancer cells could quickly change their karyotypes during the process of culturing in vitro (Dano et al, 2001;Nicholson & Duesberg, 2009). The differences between A549 karyotypes previously published and presented here may be due to different passages of subculturing.…”
Section: Comparison With Previously Published A549mentioning
confidence: 64%
“…It has been suggested that adverse outcome associated with CIN may be related to high tumor cell heterogeneity driving the ability of tumors to adapt to environmental stress, including drug treatment (Chandhok and Pellman 2009;Nicholson and Duesberg 2009). Here we found different degrees of sensitivity to chemotherapeutic drugs between MB cell lines.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%