2018
DOI: 10.1097/iae.0000000000001753
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outcomes of Patients With Exudative Age-Related Macular Degeneration Treated With Antivascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy for Three or More Years

Abstract: The body of evidence to date regarding long-term anti-VEGF treatment indicates a variable course at greater than 36 months follow-up and seems to be dependent on the treatment protocol. Consistent dosing with fluid-free interval is suggested to maintain VA gains in patients with exudative age-related macular degeneration. There is no evidence suggesting that there are additional adverse events from long-term anti-VEGF use.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There has been much debate about whether retina specialists under-treat with anti-VEGF therapy in a real world setting, and whether undertreatment could account for the observed VA decline after 2 years of treatment in CATT and other studies 7,18,19 . There are undoubtedly some patients who do not receive sufficient anti-VEGF treatment, as evidenced by persistent VEGF-driven pathology such as intraretinal fluid that we observed at years 2 and year 5, and the slightly worse average VA (2.3 letters) seen at year 2 among eyes treated PRN when compared to those treated monthly.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has been much debate about whether retina specialists under-treat with anti-VEGF therapy in a real world setting, and whether undertreatment could account for the observed VA decline after 2 years of treatment in CATT and other studies 7,18,19 . There are undoubtedly some patients who do not receive sufficient anti-VEGF treatment, as evidenced by persistent VEGF-driven pathology such as intraretinal fluid that we observed at years 2 and year 5, and the slightly worse average VA (2.3 letters) seen at year 2 among eyes treated PRN when compared to those treated monthly.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies on long-term outcomes at 1,2 5 and 7 years have all shown the reduced effectiveness of anti-VEGF agents in clinical practice and most reports have attributed these results to the reduced number of injections over time [5,6,[10][11][12][13]. Qin et al in their study on long term outcomes of exudative AMD treatment have attributed the variable results to the differences in frequency and regularity of anti-VEGF treatment [14]. The extended CATT study and the VIEW 1 extension study concluded a direct association between the number of injections and final visual acuity with more number of injections resulting in better VA outcomes [15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 122 , 126 128 Part of the reason for the loss of visual gains in the long-term is likely due to under-treatment in the “real” world. 129 , 130 However, as these retinas are virtually “dry” with little to no intraretinal fluid present, this suggests that something else is responsible for the decline in visual function observed in these patients. Even when the neovascular process is controlled, the underlying degenerative process continues with a progression of GA in patients with neovascular AMD.…”
Section: Neovascular Age-related Macular Degenerationmentioning
confidence: 99%