Intelligence and personality as predictors of illness and death: How researchers in differential psychology and chronic disease epidemiology are collaborating to understand and address health inequalities Citation for published version: Deary, IJ, Weiss, A & Batty, GD 2010, 'Intelligence and personality as predictors of illness and death: How researchers in differential psychology and chronic disease epidemiology are collaborating to understand and address health inequalities' Psychological Science in the Public Interest, vol. 11, no. 2, Publisher Rights Statement: © The Authors. This is an accepted manuscript of the following article: Deary, I. J., Weiss, A. & Batty, G. D. (2010), "Intelligence and personality as predictors of illness and death: How researchers in differential psychology and chronic disease epidemiology are collaborating to understand and address health inequalities", in Psychological Science in the Public Interest. 11, 2, p. 53-79. The final publication is available at http://psi.sagepub.com/
General rightsCopyright for the publications made accessible via the Edinburgh Research Explorer is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights.
Take down policyThe University of Edinburgh has made every reasonable effort to ensure that Edinburgh Research Explorer content complies with UK legislation. If you believe that the public display of this file breaches copyright please contact openaccess@ed.ac.uk providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.
2
AbstractWe describe the research findings that link intelligence and personality traits with health outcomes: health behaviors, morbidity, and mortality. The former field is called cognitive epidemiology, and the latter is known as personological epidemiology. However, intelligence and personality traits are the principal research topics studied by differential psychologists, and so the combined field might be termed differential epidemiology. The importance of bringing this field to wider attention lies in the facts that: the findings overviewed here are relatively new, often known neither to researchers or practitioners; the effect sizes are on a par with better-known, traditional risk factors for illness and death, so they should be broadcast as important; mechanisms of the associations are largely unknown, so they must be explored further; and the findings have yet to be applied, so we write this to encourage diverse interested parties to consider how this might be done.To make the work accessible to as many relevant researchers, practitioners, policy makers and laypersons as possible, we first provide an overview of the basic discoveries regarding intelligence and personality. In both of these areas we describe the nature and structure of the measured phenotypes. Both are well established even though we recognize that this is not always appreciated ...