Psychophysiological approaches to understanding the impact of trauma exposure

Rockstroh, Brigitte; McTeague, Lisa M.

doi:10.1111/psyp.13497

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 35 publications

(68 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In addition, differences are found in the arousal dimension in the evaluation of all images, indicating, that the custody group has greater activation than the non-custody and student groups, in the perception of pleasant and neutral images. This result indicates the impulsivity component associated with young people with antisocial behavior (Rockstroh and McTeague, 2019;Toro et al, 2020) which is consistent with a recent study finding an association between higher ratings of arousal to positive images and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder symptoms in youth (Truedsson et al, 2019). Furthermore, the results showed that custody sample were associated with lower ratings of arousal to unpleasant images, and concurrently in line with previous finding with CU in youth samples (Truedsson et al, 2019;Szabó et al, 2020).…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 92%

Emotional Assessment in Spanish Youths With Antisocial Behavior

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Impaired emotional capacity in antisocial populations is a well-known reality. Taking the dimensional approach to the study of emotion, emotions are perceived as a disposition to action; they emerge from arousal of the appetitive or aversive system, and result in subjective, behavioral, and physiological responses that are modulated by the dimensions of valence, arousal, and dominance. This study uses the International Affective Picture System (IAPS) to study the interaction between the type of picture presented (pleasant, neutral, or unpleasant) and group (adolescents under custody in juvenile justice centers, adolescents under non-custodial measures, and secondary school students) in the emotional assessment of these dimensions. The interaction between the study variables was statistically significant. Statistically significant differences were found between the three types of pictures presented, in the ratings of unpleasant pictures between the custody group and the group of secondary students in regular schooling in valence, and in the ratings of unpleasant, neutral, and pleasant pictures in arousal, between the custody group and all groups. Discriminant analyses of each affective dimension indicate that the unpleasant pictures with violent and/or aggressive content tend to be in the functions that most differentiate the antisocial groups.

show abstract