2009
DOI: 10.14341/2071-8713-4887
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationships of low serum vitamin D3 with anthropometry and markers of metabolic syndrome and diabetes in overweightand obesity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
121
3
7

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(146 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
15
121
3
7
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the present results showed the amount of visceral or abdominal fat, reflected by the waist measurement (Pajuelo et al, 2004), and the waist/height ratio (Ashwell et al, 1996a, b) to be greater in the ID than in the AD subjects, whereas no differences were observed between these groups in terms of the amount of subcutaneous fat, as reflected by the tricipital skinfold thickness and the sum of tricipital and bicipital skinfold thickness (Tables 2 and 4). This result is similar to that reported by McGill et al (2008) in adults; these researchers also found an inverse relationship between waist measurement and serum vitamin D levels (r ¼ À0.14, P ¼ 0.03). The present results suggest that it is the amount of visceral and not subcutaneous fat that determines the serum level of vitamin D in children.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, the present results showed the amount of visceral or abdominal fat, reflected by the waist measurement (Pajuelo et al, 2004), and the waist/height ratio (Ashwell et al, 1996a, b) to be greater in the ID than in the AD subjects, whereas no differences were observed between these groups in terms of the amount of subcutaneous fat, as reflected by the tricipital skinfold thickness and the sum of tricipital and bicipital skinfold thickness (Tables 2 and 4). This result is similar to that reported by McGill et al (2008) in adults; these researchers also found an inverse relationship between waist measurement and serum vitamin D levels (r ¼ À0.14, P ¼ 0.03). The present results suggest that it is the amount of visceral and not subcutaneous fat that determines the serum level of vitamin D in children.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This threshold was the 90th percentile for the serum 25(OH)D concentration in the present population and was chosen as the most beneficial concentration for metabolic health because it is thought to be 70-100 nmol/l (Talwar et al, 2007;Vieth et al, 2007;McGill et al, 2008) and it is also in accordance with different studies that have defined as vitamin D insufficiency values from o25 nmol/l to o80 nmol/l (Rovner and O'Brien, 2008).…”
Section: Anthropometric Surveymentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38] Some of the most recent information about low vitamin D status and obesity comes from studies in bariatric surgery patients, reporting low preoperative circulating levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D. [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][33][34][35][36][37][38] In fact, a recent systematic review of 14 studies with about 1500 patients undergoing bariatric surgical procedures confirmed that obese individuals have serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels below 80 nmol l À1 preoperatively. 39 Other investigators have reported that body mass index (BMI) 25,26,[40][41][42][43][44][45][46] and body fat 20,45,[47][48][49]…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among these effects, several studies in adults suggest a link between vitamin D and cardiovascular disease risk (2-4), diabetes or HbA1c levels (5,6), hypertension (7)(8)(9)(10), and dyslipidemia (4). Reduced circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) concentrations were found to be associated with higher fasting serum glucose (11,12), reduced insulin sensitivity (13)(14)(15), increased risk of type 2 diabetes (5,16,17) and either increased risk (18,19) or no effect on the metabolic syndrome (MetS) (20,21). On the other hand, results from interventional studies are controversial, showing either no effect of vitamin D supplementation on the risk of developing diabetes (22) or an attenuation of the increase in glycemia and insulin resistance that occur over time (23).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%