2020
DOI: 10.1109/access.2020.2989424
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sentiment Analysis With Comparison Enhanced Deep Neural Network

Abstract: Sentiment analysis is a significant task in Natural Language Processing. It refers to classification based on the emotional tendency in text by extracting text features. The existing results show that models based on RNN and CNN have good performance. In order to improve the performance of text sentiment analysis, we reformulate the classification task as a comparing problem, and propose Comparison Enhanced Bi-LSTM with Multi-Head Attention (CE-B-MHA). In fact, it is efficient to classify by comparison mechani… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(11 reference statements)
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…33 and Fig. 34, we observe that our proposal based on the deep learning model (CNN+FFNN), Hadoop framework, and Mamdani fuzzy system outperforms the other used approaches (Jin et al [29], Lan et al [31], Lin et al [32], Liu et al [33], and Xing et al [36]) with accuracy equal to 99.83%,99.99%, and execution time equal to 0.0089s, and 0.00534 on Sentiment140 dataset and COVID-19_Sentiments dataset respectively. Our proposal's significant effectiveness and performance are due to the application classifier, we did another experiment that compares our proposal with the other selected approaches from the literature (Jin et al [29], Lan et al [31], Lin et al [32], Liu et al [33], and Xing et al [36]).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…33 and Fig. 34, we observe that our proposal based on the deep learning model (CNN+FFNN), Hadoop framework, and Mamdani fuzzy system outperforms the other used approaches (Jin et al [29], Lan et al [31], Lin et al [32], Liu et al [33], and Xing et al [36]) with accuracy equal to 99.83%,99.99%, and execution time equal to 0.0089s, and 0.00534 on Sentiment140 dataset and COVID-19_Sentiments dataset respectively. Our proposal's significant effectiveness and performance are due to the application classifier, we did another experiment that compares our proposal with the other selected approaches from the literature (Jin et al [29], Lan et al [31], Lin et al [32], Liu et al [33], and Xing et al [36]).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…The size of our FDLC parameters is equal to (21.76M,47.82M) for COVID-19_Sentiments and Sen-timent140 dataset, respectively. As the experimental result shown, our proposed FDLC requires much lower space computational complexity compared to Jin et al [29], Lan et al [31], Lin et al [32], Liu et al [33], and Xing et al [36] approaches. Table 15 shows the empirical results obtained after measuring the time computational complexity of our FDLC model and other chosen models in terms of training time consumption and testing time consumption.…”
Section: F Complexitymentioning
confidence: 84%
See 3 more Smart Citations