2019
DOI: 10.1109/tbme.2019.2892352
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sparse Deconvolution of Electrodermal Activity via Continuous-Time System Identification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
48
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, another group proposed using the Hartley modulating function to assure convexity of the optimization formulation for estimating the number, timing, and amplitudes of underlying neural firing from EDA signals, and using Kaiser windows with different shape parameters to emphasize the significant spectral components [60]. This approach was meant to maintain a balance between noise filtering and enhancing the relevant information in the EDA data.…”
Section: Tonic/phasic Decomposition Of Edamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, another group proposed using the Hartley modulating function to assure convexity of the optimization formulation for estimating the number, timing, and amplitudes of underlying neural firing from EDA signals, and using Kaiser windows with different shape parameters to emphasize the significant spectral components [60]. This approach was meant to maintain a balance between noise filtering and enhancing the relevant information in the EDA data.…”
Section: Tonic/phasic Decomposition Of Edamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The M-step updates are likewise obtained for δ 0 and δ 1 by replacing r k with s k in Eq (23). The update for s 2 w can be obtained similarly by making the corresponding changes to γ 0 , γ 1 and r k in Eq (24).…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The phasic component comprises of a series of individual skin conductance responses (SCRs). Each SCR occurs due to the expulsion of sweat in response to a burst of sudomotor neural activity [24,25] which in turn may occur due to arousing stimuli [26]. In a typical fear conditioning experiment, the CS+ cues increasingly begin to elicit SCRs (which are typically elicited by the US) causing a rise in the skin conductance signal [27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A skin conductance signal comprises of a slow-varying tonic part and a fast-varying phasic part [39]. The phasic component consists of individual skin conductance responses (SCRs), each of which is typically modeled as being generated by a burst of neuroelectric stimuli to the sweat glands [40]. The rate at which SCRs occur, their amplitudes and the tonic level are three of the most common skin conductance-related measures of autonomic arousal used in the literature [41].…”
Section: Related Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%