2000
DOI: 10.1002/1099-0984(200005/06)14:3<265::aid-per376>3.3.co;2-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Estonian version of the NEO-PI-R: an examination of universal and culture-specific aspects of the Five-Factor Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
78
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

6
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
6
78
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Only father-rated openness in the follow-up study demonstrated relatively low internal consistency (α = .45). Coefficient alphas for the five domains of the NEO-PI-R are comparable with those reported by Kallasmaa et al (2000) for the Estonian normative adult sample.…”
Section: Preliminary Analysessupporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Only father-rated openness in the follow-up study demonstrated relatively low internal consistency (α = .45). Coefficient alphas for the five domains of the NEO-PI-R are comparable with those reported by Kallasmaa et al (2000) for the Estonian normative adult sample.…”
Section: Preliminary Analysessupporting
confidence: 74%
“…In the second wave, adolescents provided self-reports via the Estonian version of the Revised NEO Personality Inventory (Costa & McCrae, 1992;Kallasmaa, Allik, Realo, & McCrae, 2000). The NEO-PI-R is a 240-item measure of the five basic personality factors, where each factor is represented by six 8-item facet scales.…”
Section: Revised Neo Personality Inventory (Neo-pi-r)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The NEO‐PI‐R/NEO‐PI‐3 has excellent psychometric properties in a wide range of countries including Estonia [22]. For example, retest reliabilities of the Estonian NEO‐PI‐R ranged from 0.67 to 0.86 for the five domains over 2 years [23]. Participants themselves completed the self‐report form of the NEO‐PI‐3, whereas informants completed the observer‐report form.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In such leastsquared targeted rotation, the data to be examined are rotated to maximum fit with a hypothesized or established target matrix (see Kallasmaa et al ., 2000). In these analyses, the varimax two-factor structures of each country were rotated to maximum similarity with the shared factor matrix ('target') shown in Table 2.…”
Section: Factor Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%