A systematic search was conducted electronically using specific eligibility criteria. Weighted mean differences (WMDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated and combined appropriately. To ensure synthesis of the best available evidence, sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS A total of 130 data sets were included in 11 different outcomes, involving 7174 and 5076 CVD markers in women with PCOS and controls, respectively. Women with PCOS demonstrated significantly elevated CRP [WMD (95% CI) 0.99 (0.77-1.21)], Hcy [2.25 (1.46-3.03)], PAI-1 antigen [16.96 (7.25-26.28)], PAI-1 activity [0.71 (0.18-1.23)], VEGF [1.72 (0.96-2.48)], ADMA [0.19 (0.08-0.3)], AGEs [3.91 (2.36-5.45)] and Lp(a) [0.81 (0.58-1.04)] concentrations compared with controls, yet with significant between-study heterogeneity. Borderline significance (not robust in the sensitivity analyses) was detected for TNF-α [0.75 (0.07-1.44)], ET-1 [1.06 (0.52-1.59)] and fibrinogen [0.20 (0.01-0.39)], whereas no difference was detected for IL-6 [0.71 (-0.16 to 1.59)]. CONCLUSIONS Women with PCOS have increased serum concentrations of CVD risk markers compared with controls. Whether this apparent risk is translated into increased incidence of CVD in later life remains to be elucidated.
Discontinuation of bisphosphonates should be considered in all patients who have beentreated for more than five years with alendronate, risedronate or zoledronic acid. In view of the limited evidence, no robust recommendations can be made for ibandronate and denosumab. If the patient has not experienced fractures before or during therapy and the fracture risk is low, a "drug holiday" canbe recommended. Although there is no solid evidence, 1-2 years for risedronate, 3-5 years for alendronate and 3-6 years for zoledronic acid are suggested. After this time, the patient should be reassessed. If a new fracture is experienced, or fracture risk has increased or BMD remains low (femoral neck T-score ≤-2.5), anti-osteoporotic treatment should be resumed. In the case of denosumab discontinuation, close monitoring is suggested, due to the possibility of rebound fractures.
Pregnancies are rare in women with pituitary adenomas, which may relate to hormone excess from secretory subtypes such as prolactinomas or corticotroph adenomas. Decreased fertility may also result from pituitary hormone deficiencies due to compression of the gland by large tumours and/or surgical or radiation treatment of the lesion. Counselling premenopausal women with pituitary adenomas about their chance of conceiving spontaneously or with assisted reproductive technology, and the optimal pre-conception treatment, should start at the time of initial diagnosis. The normal physiological changes during pregnancy need to be considered when interpreting endocrine tests in women with pituitary adenomas. Dose adjustments in hormone substitution therapies may be needed across the trimesters. When medical therapy is used for pituitary hormone excess, consideration should be given to the known efficacy and safety data specific to pregnant women for each therapeutic option. In healthy women, pituitary gland size increases during pregnancy. Since some pituitary adenomas also enlarge during pregnancy, there is a risk of visual impairment, especially in women with macroadenomas or tumours near the optic chiasm. Pituitary apoplexy represents a rare acute complication of adenomas requiring surveillance, with surgical intervention needed in some cases. This guideline describes the choice and timing of diagnostic tests and treatments from the pre-conception stage until after delivery, taking into account adenoma size, location and endocrine activity. In most cases, pregnant women with pituitary adenomas should be managed by a multidisciplinary team in a centre specialised in the treatment of such tumours.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.