Objective: To validate and refine two sets of candidate criteria for the classification/diagnosis of axial spondyloarthritis (SpA). Methods: All Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) members were invited to include consecutively new patients with chronic (>3 months) back pain of unknown origin that began before 45 years of age. The candidate criteria were first tested in the entire cohort of 649 patients from 25 centres, and then refined in a random selection of 40% of cases and thereafter validated in the remaining 60%. Results: Upon diagnostic work-up, axial SpA was diagnosed in 60.2% of the cohort. Of these, 70% did not fulfil modified New York criteria and, therefore, were classified as having ''non-radiographic'' axial SpA. Refinement of the candidate criteria resulted in new ASAS classification criteria that are defined as: the presence of sacroiliitis by radiography or by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plus at least one SpA feature (''imaging arm'') or the presence of HLA-B27 plus at least two SpA features (''clinical arm''). The sensitivity and specificity of the entire set of the new criteria were 82.9% and 84.4%, and for the imaging arm alone 66.2% and 97.3%, respectively. The specificity of the new criteria was much better than that of the European Spondylarthropathy Study Group criteria modified for MRI (sensitivity 85.1%, specificity 65.1%) and slightly better than that of the modified Amor criteria (sensitivity 82.9, specificity 77.5%). Conclusion:The new ASAS classification criteria for axial SpA can reliably classify patients for clinical studies and may help rheumatologists in clinical practice in diagnosing axial SpA in those with chronic back pain. Trial registration number: NCT00328068.

Objective To evaluate new classifi cation criteria for peripheral spondyloarthritis (SpA) in patients with SpA with peripheral manifestations only. Methods In this Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) study, two prespecifi ed sets of criteria were compared against the European Spondylarthropathy Study Group (ESSG) and Amor criteria in newly referred consecutive patients with undiagnosed peripheral arthritis, and/or enthesitis, and/ or dactylitis that usually began before 45 years of age. The clinical diagnosis (SpA vs no SpA) made by the ASAS rheumatologist served as reference standard. Results In all, 24 ASAS centres included 266 patients, with a fi nal diagnosis of SpA being made in 66.2%. After adjustments a fi nal set of criteria showed the best balance between sensitivity (77.8%) and specifi city (82.9%): arthritis and/or enthesitis and/or dactylitis plus (A) one or more of the following parameters: psoriasis, infl ammatory bowel disease, preceding infection, human leucocyte antigen B27, uveitis, sacroiliitis on imaging, or (B) two or more other parameters: arthritis, enthesitis, dactylitis, infl ammatory back pain in the past, family history of SpA. The new criteria performed better than modifi ed versions of the ESSG (sensitivity 62.5%, specifi city 81.1%) and the Amor criteria (sensitivity 39.8%, specifi city 97.8%), particularly regarding sensitivity. In the entire ASAS population of 975 patients the combined use of ASAS criteria for axial SpA and ASAS criteria for peripheral SpA also had a better balance (sensitivity 79.5%, specifi city 83.3%) than the modifi ed ESSG (sensitivity 79.1%, specifi city 68.8%) and Amor criteria (sensitivity 67.5%, specifi city 86.7%), respectively. Conclusions The new ASAS classifi cation criteria for peripheral SpA performed well in patients presenting with peripheral arthritis, enthesitis and/or dactylitis.

BackgroundTherapeutic targets have been defined for diseases like diabetes, hypertension or rheumatoid arthritis and adhering to them has improved outcomes. Such targets are just emerging for spondyloarthritis (SpA).ObjectiveTo define the treatment target for SpA including ankylosing spondylitis and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and develop recommendations for achieving the target, including a treat-to-target management strategy.MethodsBased on results of a systematic literature review and expert opinion, a task force of expert physicians and patients developed recommendations which were broadly discussed and voted upon in a Delphi-like process. Level of evidence, grade and strength of the recommendations were derived by respective means. The commonalities between axial SpA, peripheral SpA and PsA were discussed in detail.ResultsAlthough the literature review did not reveal trials comparing a treat-to-target approach with another or no strategy, it provided indirect evidence regarding an optimised approach to therapy that facilitated the development of recommendations. The group agreed on 5 overarching principles and 11 recommendations; 9 of these recommendations related commonly to the whole spectrum of SpA and PsA, and only 2 were designed separately for axial SpA, peripheral SpA and PsA. The main treatment target, which should be based on a shared decision with the patient, was defined as remission, with the alternative target of low disease activity. Follow-up examinations at regular intervals that depend on the patient's status should safeguard the evolution of disease activity towards the targeted goal. Additional recommendations relate to extra-articular and extramusculoskeletal aspects and other important factors, such as comorbidity. While the level of evidence was generally quite low, the mean strength of recommendation was 9–10 (10: maximum agreement) for all recommendations. A research agenda was formulated.ConclusionsThe task force defined the treatment target as remission or, alternatively, low disease activity, being aware that the evidence base is not strong and needs to be expanded by future research. These recommendations can inform the various stakeholders about expert opinion that aims for reaching optimal outcomes of SpA.

No abstract

Background: Biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) are recommended for radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (r-axSpA), otherwise known as ankylosing spondylitis, when conventional therapies fail. We report efficacy and safety results of a Phase 3 study of ixekizumab, a high-affinity monoclonal antibody that selectively targets IL-17A, in bDMARDnaïve patients with r-axSpA. Methods: In this randomized, double-blind, Phase 3 study, adult patients with inadequate response/intolerance to NSAIDs, an established diagnosis of r-axSpA, and with radiographic sacroiliitis centrally defined by modified New York criteria and ≥1 spondyloarthritis feature according to Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS) criteria were recruited from 84 sites (12 countries) in Europe, Asia, and North America. Patients were randomized 1:1:1:1 using a computer-generated random sequence to 80 mg subcutaneous ixekizumab every two (Q2W) or four (Q4W) weeks, 40 mg adalimumab Q2W (active reference arm), or placebo. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving an ASAS40 response at Week 16. Findings: Between June 20, 2016 and August 22, 2017, 341 patients were randomized to placebo (N=87), adalimumab (N=90), ixekizumab Q2W (N=83), or ixekizumab Q4W (N=81). At Week 16, significantly more patients achieved ASAS40 with ixekizumab Q2W (n=43, 51•8%, p<0•0001), ixekizumab Q4W (n=39, 48•1%, p<0•0001), and adalimumab (n=32, 35•6%; p=0•0053) versus placebo (n=16, 18•4%). One serious infection occurred in each of the ixekizumab Q2W (1•2%), ixekizumab Q4W (1•2%), and adalimumab (1•1%) arms; none were reported with placebo. One (1•1%) Candida infection occurred in the adalimumab arm and one (1•2%) patient receiving ixekizumab Q2W was adjudicated as having probable Crohn's disease. No opportunistic infections, malignancies, or deaths occurred. Interpretation: Each dosing regimen of ixekizumab was superior to placebo for improving r-axSpA signs and symptoms in bDMARD-naïve patients; the safety profile was consistent with previous studies of ixekizumab. The adalimumab control arm performed as expected. Funding: Eli Lilly and Company Research in context Evidence before this study Pubmed was searched using the terms "ankylosing spondylitis", "axial spondyloarthritis", and "disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs", including articles through May 30, 2018. Axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is a chronic immune-mediated disease characterized by inflammation of the spine and sacroiliac joint (SIJ), peripheral joint involvement, extra articular manifestations, and a strong genetic association with human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-B27. Radiographic axSpA (r-axSpA) was previously classified as ankylosing spondylitis (AS) in 1984 and updated to r-axSpA as part of the ASAS criteria. Both criteria sets require the same radiographically confirmed structural damage to the sacroiliac joint as well as at least one accompanying clinical element. Recommendations for the management of r-axSpA generally include exercise and physiothera...

ObjectivesTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of risankizumab, a humanised monoclonal antibody targeting the p19 subunit of interleukin-23 (IL-23), in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis (AS).MethodsA total of 159 patients with biological-naïve AS, with active disease (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index score of ≥4), were randomised (1:1:1:1) to risankizumab (18 mg single dose, 90 mg or 180 mg at day 1 and weeks 8, 16 and 24) or placebo over a 24-week blinded period. The primary outcome was a 40% improvement in Assessment in Spondylo Arthritis International Society (ASAS40) at week 12. Safety was assessed in patients who received at least one dose of study drug.ResultsAt week 12, ASAS40 response rates were 25.5%, 20.5% and 15.0% in the 18 mg, 90 mg and 180 mg risankizumab groups, respectively, compared with 17.5% in the placebo group. The estimated difference in proportion between the 180 mg risankizumab and placebo groups (primary endpoint) was –2.5% (95% CI –21.8 to 17.0; p=0.42). Rates of adverse events were similar in all treatment groups.ConclusionsTreatment with risankizumab did not meet the study primary endpoint and showed no evidence of clinically meaningful improvements compared with placebo in patients with active AS, suggesting that IL-23 may not be a relevant driver of disease pathogenesis and symptoms in AS.Trial registration number NCT02047110; Pre-results.

ObjectivesTo compare efficacy and safety of various doses of tofacitinib, an oral Janus kinase inhibitor, with placebo in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis (AS, radiographic axial spondyloarthritis).MethodsIn this 16-week (12-week treatment, 4-week washout), phase II, multicentre, dose-ranging trial, adult patients with active AS were randomised (N=51, 52, 52, 52, respectively) to placebo or tofacitinib 2, 5 or 10 mg twice daily. The primary efficacy endpoint was Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society 20% improvement (ASAS20) response rate at week 12. Secondary endpoints included objective measures of disease activity, patient-reported outcomes and MRI of sacroiliac joints and spine. Safety was monitored.ResultsEmax model analysis of the primary endpoint predicted a tofacitinib 10 mg twice daily ASAS20 response rate of 67.4%, 27.3% higher than placebo. Supportive normal approximation analysis demonstrated tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily ASAS20 response rate significantly higher than placebo (80.8% vs 41.2%; p<0.001); tofacitinib 2 and 10 mg twice daily demonstrated greater response rate than placebo (51.9% and 55.8%, respectively; not significant). Secondary endpoints generally demonstrated greater improvements with tofacitinib 5 and 10 mg twice daily than placebo. Objective (including MRI) endpoints demonstrated clear dose response. Adverse events were similar across treatment groups with no unexpected safety findings. Dose-dependent laboratory outcome changes returned close to baseline by week 16.ConclusionsTofacitinib 5 and 10 mg twice daily demonstrated greater clinical efficacy versus placebo in reducing signs, symptoms and objective endpoints of active AS in adult patients with a similar 12-week safety profile as reported in other indications.Trial registration number NCT01786668.

Objective. To assess the efficacy of etanercept in the treatment of early active nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug (NSAID)-refractory nonradiographic axial spondyloarthritis (SpA).Methods. The study population consisted of patients who met the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) classification criteria for axial SpA but not the modified New York radiographic criteria for ankylosing spondylitis (as assessed by a radiologist at the central trial site), had a symptom duration of >3 months but <5 years, had a score of >4 on the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index, and had been treated unsuccessfully with >2 NSAIDs. Patients were randomized to receive etanercept 50 mg/week or placebo and continued background NSAID treatment for 12 weeks (double-blind study); ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01258738.