'New' memories are initially labile and sensitive to disruption before being consolidated into stable long-term memories. Much evidence indicates that this consolidation involves the synthesis of new proteins in neurons. The lateral and basal nuclei of the amygdala (LBA) are believed to be a site of memory storage in fear learning. Infusion of the protein synthesis inhibitor anisomycin into the LBA shortly after training prevents consolidation of fear memories. Here we show that consolidated fear memories, when reactivated during retrieval, return to a labile state in which infusion of anisomycin shortly after memory reactivation produces amnesia on later tests, regardless of whether reactivation was performed 1 or 14 days after conditioning. The same treatment with anisomycin, in the absence of memory reactivation, left memory intact. Consistent with a time-limited role for protein synthesis production in consolidation, delay of the infusion until six hours after memory reactivation produced no amnesia. Our data show that consolidated fear memories, when reactivated, return to a labile state that requires de novo protein synthesis for reconsolidation. These findings are not predicted by traditional theories of memory consolidation.

Cellular theories of memory consolidation posit that new memories require new protein synthesis in order to be stored. Systems consolidation theories posit that the hippocampus has a time-limited role in memory storage, after which the memory is independent of the hippocampus. Here, we show that intra-hippocampal infusions of the protein synthesis inhibitor anisomycin caused amnesia for a consolidated hippocampal-dependent contextual fear memory, but only if the memory was reactivated prior to infusion. The effect occurred even if reactivation was delayed for 45 days after training, a time when contextual memory is independent of the hippocampus. Indeed, reactivation of a hippocampus-independent memory caused the trace to again become hippocampus dependent, but only for 2 days rather than for weeks. Thus, hippocampal memories can undergo reconsolidation at both the cellular and systems levels.

Phosphorylation of the α-subunit of initiation factor 2 (eIF2) controls protein synthesis by a conserved mechanism. In metazoa, distinct stress conditions activate different eIF2α kinases (PERK, PKR, GCN2, and HRI) that converge on phosphorylating a unique serine in eIF2α. This collection of signaling pathways is termed the ‘integrated stress response’ (ISR). eIF2α phosphorylation diminishes protein synthesis, while allowing preferential translation of some mRNAs. Starting with a cell-based screen for inhibitors of PERK signaling, we identified a small molecule, named ISRIB, that potently (IC50 = 5 nM) reverses the effects of eIF2α phosphorylation. ISRIB reduces the viability of cells subjected to PERK-activation by chronic endoplasmic reticulum stress. eIF2α phosphorylation is implicated in memory consolidation. Remarkably, ISRIB-treated mice display significant enhancement in spatial and fear-associated learning. Thus, memory consolidation is inherently limited by the ISR, and ISRIB releases this brake. As such, ISRIB promises to contribute to our understanding and treatment of cognitive disorders.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.00498.001

Hyperconnectivity of neuronal circuits due to increased synaptic protein synthesis is postulated to cause Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD). The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) is strongly implicated in ASD via upstream signaling. However, downstream regulatory mechanisms are ill-defined. We show that knockout (KO) of the eukaryotic translation Initiation Factor 4E-Binding Protein 2 (4E-BP2), an eIF4E-repressor downstream of mTOR, or eIF4E overexpression lead to increased translation of neuroligins, which are post-synaptic proteins that are causally linked to ASD. 4E-BP2-KO mice exhibit an increased ratio of excitatory to inhibitory synaptic inputs and autistic-like behaviors: social interaction deficits, altered communication and repetitive/stereotyped behaviors. Pharmacological inhibition of eIF4E activity or normalization of neuroligin 1, but not neuroligin 2 protein amounts, restore the normal excitation/inhibition ratio and rectify the social behavior deficits. Thus, translational control by eIF4E regulates the synthesis of neuroligins, maintaining the excitation to inhibition balance, and its dysregulation engenders ASD-like phenotypes.

Consolidated memories can re-enter states of transient instability following reactivation, from which they must again stabilize in order to persist, contradicting the previously dominant view that memory and its associated plasticity mechanisms progressively and irreversibly decline with time. We witness exciting times, as neuroscience begins embracing a position, long-held in cognitive psychology, that recognizes memory as a principally dynamic process. In light of remaining controversy, we here establish that the same operational definitions and types of evidence underpin the deduction of both reconsolidation and consolidation, thus validating the extrapolation that post-retrieval memory plasticity reflects processes akin to those that stabilized the memory following acquisition.

The late phase of long-term potentiation (LTP) and memory (LTM) requires new gene expression, but the molecular mechanisms that underlie these processes are not fully understood. Phosphorylation of eIF2alpha inhibits general translation but selectively stimulates translation of ATF4, a repressor of CREB-mediated late-LTP (L-LTP) and LTM. We used a pharmacogenetic bidirectional approach to examine the role of eIF2alpha phosphorylation in synaptic plasticity and behavioral learning. We show that in eIF2alpha(+/S51A) mice, in which eIF2alpha phosphorylation is reduced, the threshold for eliciting L-LTP in hippocampal slices is lowered, and memory is enhanced. In contrast, only early-LTP is evoked by repeated tetanic stimulation and LTM is impaired, when eIF2alpha phosphorylation is increased by injecting into the hippocampus a small molecule, Sal003, which prevents the dephosphorylation of eIF2alpha. These findings highlight the importance of a single phosphorylation site in eIF2alpha as a key regulator of L-LTP and LTM formation.

No abstract

Studies on various forms of synaptic plasticity have demonstrated a link between mRNA translation, learning and memory. Like memory, synaptic plasticity includes an early phase which depends on modification of pre-existing proteins, and a late phase that requires transcription and synthesis of new proteins 1,2 . Activation of post-synaptic targets appears to trigger the transcription of plasticityrelated genes. The new mRNAs are either translated in the soma or transported to synapses before translation. GCN2, a key protein kinase, regulates the initiation of translation. We now report a unique feature of hippocampal slices from GCN2 -/-mice: in CA1, a single 100 Hz train induces a strong and sustained long-term potentiation (late-LTP or L-LTP), which is transcription and translation dependent. In contrast, stimulation that elicits late-LTP in wild type slices, such as four 100 Hz trains or forskolin, fails to evoke L-LTP in GCN2 -/-slices. This aberrant synaptic plasticity is mirrored in the behavior of GCN2 -/-mice in the Morris water maze: after weak training, their spatial memory is enhanced, but it is impaired after more intense training. Activated GCN2 stimulates mRNA translation of ATF4, a CREB antagonist. Accordingly, in the hippocampus of GCN2 -/-mice, the expression of ATF4 is reduced and CREB activity is increased. Our study provides genetic, physiological, behavioral and molecular evidence that GCN2 regulates synaptic plasticity, as well as learning and memory through modulation of the ATF4/CREB pathway.Translation of eukaryotic mRNAs is primarily regulated at the level of initiation 3 . Binding of the initiator tRNA, Met-tRNA i Met , to the 40S subunit is facilitated by the initiation factor 2 (eIF2) which forms a ternary complex with GTP and Met-tRNA i Met . Although phosphorylation