Purpose: Immune dysfunction reported in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients may contribute to tumor progression. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC) represent one mechanism by which tumors induce T-cell suppression. Several factors pivotal to the accumulation of MDSC are targeted by the tyrosine kinase inhibitor, sunitinib. The effect of sunitinib on MDSC-mediated immunosuppression in RCC patients has been investigated. Experimental Design: Patient peripheral blood levels of MDSC and regulatoryT-cell (Treg) and T-cell production of IFN-g were evaluated before and after sunitinib treatment. Correlations between MDSC and Treg normalization as well asT-cell production of IFN-g were examined. The in vitro effect of sunitinib on patient MDSC was evaluated. Results: Metastatic RCC patients had elevated levels of CD33 + HLA-DR -and CD15 + CD14-MDSC, and these were partially overlapping populations. Treatment with sunitinib resulted in significant reduction in MDSC measured by several criteria. Sunitinib-mediated reduction in MDSC was correlated with reversal of type 1 T-cell suppression, an effect that could be reproduced by the depletion of MDSC in vitro. MDSC reduction in response to sunitinib correlated with a reversal of CD3 + CD4 + CD25 hi Foxp3 + Treg cell elevation. No correlation existed between a change in tumor burden and a change in MDSC, Treg, or T-cell production of IFN-g. In vitro addition of sunitinib reduced MDSC viability and suppressive effect when used at z1.0 Ag/mL. Sunitinib did not induce MDSC maturation in vitro. Conclusions: Sunitinib-based therapy has the potential to modulate antitumor immunity by reversing MDSC-mediated tumor-induced immunosuppression.

No abstract

Although a more toxic regimen, we found M-VAC to be superior to single-agent cisplatin with respect to response rate, duration of remission, and overall survival in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma.

Context.-Lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) has been shown to stimulate proliferation of ovarian cancer cells and is present in the ascitic fluid of patients with ovarian cancer.Objectives.-To determine whether elevated levels of LPA are present in plasma from patients with ovarian cancer and other gynecologic malignancies compared with healthy controls and to evaluate whether an elevated LPA plasma level may be a biomarker for these diseases.Design.-A research assay was used to measure total LPA levels in plasma from healthy women and women with different diseases. All LPA assays and comparison of LPA levels and CA125 (an ovarian cancer biomarker) levels were performed by observers blinded to patient status or group.Setting.-The Cleveland Clinic Foundation.Participants.-A convenience sample of 48 healthy control women, 48 women with ovarian cancer, 36 women with other gynecologic cancers, 17 women with benign gynecologic diseases, 11 women with breast cancer, and 5 women with leukemias.Main Outcome Measures.-Total LPA levels in plasma samples from patients and controls.Results.-Patients in the ovarian cancer group had significantly higher plasma LPA levels (mean, 8.6 µmol/L; range, 1.0-43.1 µmol/L) compared with the healthy control group (mean, 0.6 µmol/L; range, Ͻ0.1-6.3 µmol/L) (PϽ.001). Elevated plasma LPA levels were detected in 9 of 10 patients with stage I ovarian cancer, 24 of 24 patients with stage II, III, and IV ovarian cancer, and 14 of 14 patients with recurrent ovarian cancer. Of 36 patients with other gynecologic cancers, 33 also showed higher LPA levels (mean, 14.9 µmol/L; range, Ͻ0.1-63.2 µmol/L), compared with healthy controls (PϽ.001). Elevated plasma LPA levels were detected in 5 of 48 controls and 4 of 17 patients with benign gynecologic diseases and in no women with breast cancer or leukemia. In comparison, among a subset of patients with ovarian cancer, 28 of 47 had elevated CA125 levels, including 2 of 9 patients with stage I disease.Conclusions.-Plasma LPA levels may represent a potential biomarker for ovarian cancer and other gynecologic cancers. However, these findings are preliminary and require confirmation in larger studies.

Purpose: Immune dysfunction is well documented in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients and likely contributes to tumor evasion. This dysfunction includes a shift from a type-1 to a type-2 T-cell cytokine response and enhanced T-regulatory (Treg) cell expression. Given the antitumor activity of select tyrosine kinase inhibitors such as sunitinib in metastatic RCC (mRCC) patients, it is relevant to assess their effect on the immune system. Experimental Design: Type-1 (IFNg) and type-2 (interleukin-4) responses were assessed in T cells at baseline and day 28 of treatment with sunitinib (50 mg/d) by measuring intracellular cytokines after in vitro stimulation with anti-CD3/anti-CD28 antibodies. Results: After one cycle of treatment, there was a significant increase in the percentage of IFNgproducingTcells (CD3 + , P < 0.001; CD3 + CD4 + , P = 0.001), a reduction in interleukin-4 production (CD3 + cells, P = 0.05), and a diminished type-2 bias (P = 0.005).The increase in type-1response may be partly related to modulation of Treg cells. The increased percentage of Treg cells noted in mRCC patients over healthy donors (P = 0.001) was reduced after treatment, although not reaching statistical significance. There was, however, an inverse correlation between the increase in type-1response after two cycles of treatment and a decrease in the percentage of Treg cells (r = -0.64, P = 0.01). In vitro studies suggest that the effects of sunitinib onTreg cells are indirect. Conclusions: The demonstration that sunitinib improved type-1 T-cell cytokine response in mRCC patients while reducingTreg function provides a basis for the rational combination of sunitinib and immunotherapy in mRCC.

These data validate the model described by Motzer et al. Additional independent prognostic factors identified were prior radiotherapy and sites of metastasis. Incorporation of these additional prognostic factors into the Motzer et al model can help better define favorable risk, intermediate risk, and poor risk patients.

Carboplatin hypersensitivity reactions develop in patients who have been extensively pretreated with the agent. The clinical features are highly variable, but they are sufficiently different from those noted after the administration of paclitaxel that it should not be difficult to distinguish between reactions to the two agents. As carboplatin is increasingly used as initial and second-line chemotherapy of ovarian cancer and other malignancies, it can be anticipated that hypersensitivity reactions to the drug will become a more common and difficult clinical management issue.

Within a single institution, single surgical team, prospective, randomized trial, laparoscopic techniques offered a faster recovery of pulmonary function, fewer complications, and shorter length of stay compared with conventional surgery for selected patients undergoing ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease.