BackgroundThe number of cases of gonorrhoea in the USA and worldwide caused by Neisseria gonorrhoeae is increasing (555 608 reported US cases in 2017, and 87 million cases worldwide in 2016). Many countries report declining in vitro susceptibility of azithromycin, which is a concern because azithromycin and ceftriaxone are the recommended dual treatment in many countries. We aimed to identify strain types associated with decreased susceptibility to azithromycin.
MethodsWe did a genomic analysis of N gonorrhoeae isolates obtained by the US Gonococcal Isolate Surveillance Project. Isolates were whole-genome sequenced based on decreased susceptibility to azithromycin (minimal inhibitory concentration [MIC] ≥2 µg/mL, using agar dilution antibiotic susceptibility testing) and geographical representation. Bioinformatic analyses established genomic diversity, strain population dynamics, and antimicrobial resistance profiles. Findings 410 isolates were sorted into more than 20 unique phylogenetic clades. One predominant persistent clade (consisting of 97 isolates) included the most isolates with azithromycin MICs of 2 µg/mL or higher (61 of 97 [63%] vs 59 of 311 [19%]; p<0•0001) and carried a mosaic mtr (multiple transferable resistance) locus (68 of 97 [70%] vs two of 313 [1%]; p<0•0001). Of the remaining 313 isolates, 57 (18%) had decreased susceptibility to azithromycin (MIC ≥4 µg/mL), which was attributed to 23S rRNA variants (56 of 57 [98%]) and formed phylogenetically diverse clades, showing various levels of clonal expansion. Interpretation Reduced azithromycin susceptibility was associated with expanding and persistent clades harbouring two well described resistance mechanisms, mosaic mtr locus and 23S rRNA variants. Understanding the role of recombination, particularly within the mtr locus, on the fitness and expansion of strains with decreased susceptibility has important implications for the public health response to minimise gonorrhoea transmission. Funding US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), CDC Combating Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria initiative,
AO-RRP was not associated with previously proposed risk factors for juvenile-onset RRP and may be associated with an increased number of lifetime sexual partners.
In-office KTP ablation of vocal fold polyps had a favorable effect on patient-reported handicap as determined by the VHI-10. This treatment also slightly altered physiologic measures of voice; however, these measures did not achieve statistical significance.
Objectives/Hypothesis: To describe the distribution of recurrent respiratory papillomatosis (RRP) lesions across 21 laryngeal anatomic regions in previously untreated patients at initial presentation to provide insight regarding the natural history of RRP.Study Design: Multi-institutional, retrospective case series. Methods: Initial laryngoscopic examination videos of 83 previously untreated patients with adult-onset RRP were reviewed. Papilloma locations were recorded using a 21-region laryngeal schematic. Multivariate analyses by anatomic subsite were conducted for the entire population and for subgroups stratified by sex, age, and proton pump inhibitor (PPI) usage. Heat maps were generated, hierarchically color coding the anatomic distribution of disease.Results: In this cohort, RRP was most likely to occur on the true vocal folds (TVFs) and anterior commissure (P <.0001, odds ratio [OR]: 7.02); within the TVFs, the membranous vocal folds (MVFs) were most likely to be affected (P <.0001, OR: 3.56). The cohort was predominantly male (80.7%); males had a higher average number of affected sites (P 5.005) and were more likely to have lesions in any laryngeal subsite (P <.0001, OR: 2.88,) compared to females. PPI users were more likely than nonusers to have disease in any laryngeal subsite (P 5.0037, OR: 1.62), particularly in the posterior and subglottic regions (P 5.0061, OR: 2.53). Age was not correlated with lesion prevalence or distribution.Conclusions: In untreated patients presenting to three laryngology clinics, the MVFs were most likely to be affected by RRP. Males had more anatomic sites affected by papilloma than females. The influence of PPI use on RRP distribution warrants further investigation.
E. coli was isolated from the Salish Sea (Puget Sound) ecosystem, including samples of marine and fresh water, and wildlife dependent on this environment. E. coli isolates were assessed for phenotypic and genotypic resistance to antibiotics. A total of 305 E. coli isolates was characterized from samples collected from: marine water obtained in four quadrants of the Salish Sea; select locations near beaches; fresh water from streams near marine beaches; and fecal samples from harbor porpoises (Phocoena phocoena), harbor seals (Phoca vitulina), river otters (Lontra canadensis), and English sole (Parophrys vetulus). Isolates were evaluated using antimicrobial susceptibility typing, whole-genome sequencing, fumC, and multilocus sequence typing. Resistance and virulence genes were identified from sequence data. Of the 305 isolates from Salish Sea samples, 20 (6.6%) of the E. coli were intermediate, and 31 (10.2%) were resistant to ≥1 class of antibiotics, with 26.9% of nonsusceptible (resistant and intermediate resistant) E. coli isolates from marine mammals and 70% from river otters. The proportion of nonsusceptible isolates from animals was significantly higher than samples taken from marine water (p < 0.0001). A total of 196 unique STs was identified including 37 extraintestinal pathogenic E. coli (ExPEC)-associated STs [ST10, ST38, ST58, ST69, ST73, ST117, ST131, and ST405]. The study suggests that animals may be potential sentinels for antibiotic-resistant and ExPEC E. coli in the Salish Sea ecosystem.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.