No abstract

Nonetheless, there is a compelling case for the implementation of interventions to reduce the impact of PND on the quality of the mother-infant relationship and improve child outcomes.

Introduction

BackgroundAlthough the prevalence of depression is similar in pregnant, postpartum and non-pregnant women, the onset of new depression is higher during the perinatal period. Women of low-income, and those living in low and middle income countries, are known to be at particularly high risk. Early identification and treatment of antenatal depression may improve pregnancy outcomes and could serve as an early indicator of postnatal depression. Culturally sensitive and accurate diagnostic tools are urgently needed.MethodsA consecutive series of 109 pregnant women were recruited in the third trimester at a primary health clinic, in a rural part of South Africa, with a high HIV prevalence. A cross sectional assessment of depression was completed using a structured clinical interview method and DSM-IV diagnostic criteria. Qualitative data on women's descriptions of depressive symptoms was also collected. The aim was to examine the prevalence of depression and to better understand the presentation of depressive symptomatology in this population.ResultsPrevalence of depression was high, 51/109 (47%), with over half of the depressed women 34/51(67%) reporting episode duration greater than two months. 8/51 reported a prior history of depression. Women used psychological language to describe symptoms and, as a result, standardised diagnostic tools were culturally sensitive. Somatic pregnancy symptoms were frequently reported, but did not overestimate depression. Both HIV positive (27/51) and HIV negative (24/51) women were at risk of being depressed.LimitationsThe study is limited by the small sample size and possible attrition biases.ConclusionAntenatal depression is high and clinical presentation is similar to high income countries. Standardised diagnostic tools are culturally sensitive and adequate for early detection.

No abstract

When a child is diagnosed with a life threatening condition, one of the most challenging tasks facing healthcare professionals is to communicate this to the child, as well as to their parents or caregivers. Evidence-based guidelines are urgently needed for all healthcare settings, from tertiary referral centres in high income countries to resource limited environments in low and middle income countries, where rates of child mortality are high. We place this narrative review in the context of children's developing understanding of illness and death. We review the impact of communication on children's emotional, behavioural and social functioning, as well as treatment adherence, disease progression and wider family relationships. We consider the factors that influence the process of communication and the preferences of children, families and healthcare professionals about how to convey the diagnosis. Critically, the barriers and challenges to effective communication are explored. Finally, we outline principles for communicating with children, parents and caregivers, generated from a workshop of international experts. Communication with Children and Adolescents about the Diagnosis of their own Life Threatening ConditionAlan Stein (AS) conceptualized and the designed the review. Louise Dalton (LD), Lucy Hanington (LH), Kim Fredman Stein (KFS) and AS undertook the literature searches and selected the studies. AS, LD and Elizabeth Rapa (ER) gathered the information from the studies and drafted the manuscript. Myra Bluebond-Langner (MBL), Sue Ziebland (SZ), Emily Harrop (EH), Ruth Bland (RB), Brenda Kelly (BK), Tamsen Rochat (TR) and KFS provided specific input to different sections of the manuscript; Communication Expert Group commented on drafts of the manuscript and contributed to the development of the guidelines. LD and ER compiled the tables. All authors have read and approved the final version of the Review. Conflict of Interest statementsEH declares she is deputy chair of the NICE clinical guideline development committee for NG61 (End of Life Care in Infants, Children and Young People). All of the other authors declare no Conflicts of Interest Role of funding sourceThe funder of the study had no role in any aspect of the review.

Communication with Children and Adolescents about the Diagnosis of a Life Threatening Condition in their Parent Many adults diagnosed with a life threatening condition have children living at home; they and their partners face the dual challenge of coping with the diagnosis while trying to maintain a parenting role. Parents are often uncertain about how, when and what to tell their children about the condition and are fearful of the impact on their family. There is evidence that children are often aware that something is seriously wrong and want honest information. Healthcare professionals play a key role in supporting and guiding parents and caregivers to communicate with their children about the diagnosis. However, the practical and emotional challenges of communicating with families are compounded by a lack of evidence-based guidelines. This narrative review considers children's awareness and understanding of their parents' condition, the effect of communication around parental life threatening condition on their wellbeing, factors that influence communication and the challenges to achieving effective communication. Children's and parents' preferences about communication are outlined. An expert workshop was convened to generate principles for healthcare professionals, intended as practical guidance in the current absence of empirically-derived guidelines.

Throughout Africa, Peer Mentors who are women living with HIV (WLH) are supporting pregnant WLH at antenatal and primary healthcare clinics (McColl in BMJ 344:e1590, 2012). We evaluate a program using this intervention strategy at 1.5 months post-birth. In a cluster randomized controlled trial in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa, eight clinics were randomized for their WLH to receive either: standard care (SC), based on national guidelines to prevent mother-to-child transmission (4 clinics; n = 656 WLH); or an enhanced intervention (EI; 4 clinics; n = 544 WLH). The EI consisted of four antenatal and four postnatal small group sessions led by Peer Mentors, in addition to SC. WLH were recruited during pregnancy and 70 % were reassessed at 1.5 months post-birth. EI's effect was ascertained on 16 measures of maternal and infant well-being using random effects regressions to control for clinic clustering. A binomial test for correlated outcomes evaluated EI's overall effectiveness. Among EI WLH reassessed, 87 % attended at least one intervention session (mean 4.1, SD 2.0). Significant overall benefits were found in EI compared to SC using the binomial test. However, it is important to note that EI WLH were significantly less likely to adhere to ARV during pregnancy compared to SC. Secondarily, compared to SC, EI WLH were more likely to ask partners to test for HIV, better protected their infants from HIV transmission, and were less likely to have depressed mood and stunted infants. Adherence to clinic intervention groups was low, yet, there were benefits for maternal and infant health at 1.5 months post-birth.