Personality and Longevity: Knowns, Unknowns, and Implications for Public Health and Personalized Medicine

Abstract

We review evidence for links between personality traits and longevity. We provide an overview of personality for health scientists, using the primary organizing framework used in the study of personality and longevity. We then review data on various aspects of personality linked to longevity. In general, there is good evidence that higher level of conscientiousness and lower levels of hostility and Type D or “distressed” personality are associated with greater longevity. Limited evidence suggests that extraversion, openness, perceived control, and low levels of emotional suppression may be associated with longer lifespan. Findings regarding neuroticism are mixed, supporting the notion that many component(s) of neuroticism detract from life expectancy, but some components at some levels may be healthy or protective. Overall, evidence suggests various personality traits are significant predictors of longevity and points to several promising directions for further study. We conclude by discussing the implications of these links for epidemiologic research and personalized medicine and lay out a translational research agenda for integrating the psychology of individual differences into public health and medicine.

How do people respond to health news? The role of personality traits

“…The relationship of personality and responses adds to general call for the inclusion of personality measurement in health care (Chapman, Roberts & Duberstein, 2011;Israel et al, 2014).…”

Childhood onset of migraine, gender, parental social class, and trait neuroticism as predictors of the prevalence of migraine in adulthood

“…Neuroticism, in particular, has been strongly implicated with numerous health outcomes and longevity (Bogg & Roberts, 2004;Chapman et al, 2011;Goodwin & Friedman, 2006;Hagger-Johnson et al, 2012;Kern & Friedman, 2008). Earlier Eysenck (1985) noted that individuals high in Neuroticism and low in Conscientiousness were more prone to developing chronic psychosomatic illnesses.…”

Psychological characteristics and mental health problems in mexican students: A structural analysis

“…La línea de investigación del «tipo A» se h visto debilitada en las últimas décadas debido a una visión unicista y atemporal de relaciones simples con la salud y a la omisión de mecanismos específicos e intermedios que configuran distintas sinergias implicadas en este proceso, entre ellos, el manejo y expresión de las emociones, en particular el de la ira-hostilidad (Friedman, 2008;Spielberger et al, 1985;Williams, Barefoot y Shekelle, 1985). Cabe resaltar que el mismo «tipo A» de personalidad puede vislumbrarse a su vez como un mecanismo mediador y resultado de combinación de factores generales de personalidad tales como el neuroticismo, agradabilidad y la conciencia (Chapman et al, 2011;Friedman, 2000), los que pueden tener valencias positivas y negativas de su contribución a la salud dependiendo de la particularidad de sus sinergias y, por ello, quizás las inconsistencias previas en su estudio. La separación posterior de componentes tóxicos y de los saludables en los tipo A llevó a la identificación de la hostilidad como particular elemento de riesgo a la salud (Dembroski y Costa, 1987;Siegman y Smith, 1994 de manera diferencial.…”