2001
DOI: 10.1097/00005768-200106001-00013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Individual differences in response to regular physical activity

Abstract: There is strong evidence for considerable heterogeneity in the responsiveness to regular physical activity. Age, sex, and ethnic origin are not major determinants of human responses to regular physical activity, whereas the pretraining level of a phenotype has a considerable impact in some cases. Familial factors also contribute significantly to variability in training response.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

37
648
7
12

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 739 publications
(704 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
37
648
7
12
Order By: Relevance
“…Alternatively, it could be that our small sample included several non-responders. Previous studies have comprehensively demonstrated that following a period of exercise training part of the population will not adapt for specific parameters (non-responders), and for insulin sensitivity this has been shown to be the case for up to 40% of the population (Boule et al 2005;Vollaard et al 2009;Bouchard and Rankinen 2001). Therefore, further studies with larger sample sizes will be needed to confirm or refute our initial observations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Alternatively, it could be that our small sample included several non-responders. Previous studies have comprehensively demonstrated that following a period of exercise training part of the population will not adapt for specific parameters (non-responders), and for insulin sensitivity this has been shown to be the case for up to 40% of the population (Boule et al 2005;Vollaard et al 2009;Bouchard and Rankinen 2001). Therefore, further studies with larger sample sizes will be needed to confirm or refute our initial observations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…For instance, a mean increase of 25 % in endurance performance during a standardized training program hides the fact that some individuals may have improved 50 % or even more, whereas others may not improve at all. Age, sex, and ethnic origin seem to have only minor effect on human responses to regular physical activity, whereas the initial training status and genetic factors are significant contributors to "trainability" of individuals (Bouchard & Rankinen, 2001). No single marker has been identified that can accurately assess how an athlete is adapting and responding to a training programme (Borresen & Lambert, 2008a), but the resting level of HRV has been found to correlate with response to aerobic training in healthy sedentary subjects (Hautala et al 2003).…”
Section: Individual Differences In Response To Trainingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Understanding the variation within an individual may be useful in determining the number of days needed to estimate habitual PA; however, in the broader sense, this information may also be used to further characterize the PA phenotype. Although the between-individual response to PA has previously been examined (Bouchard and Rankinen, 2001), specific studies regarding the between-individual variation in PA and TEE are warranted. This information may improve our understanding of the biological mechanisms that control TEE and PA (Rowland, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%