Reliability and Validity of the IPAQ-Chinese

Deng, Han Bing; Macfarlane, Duncan J.; Thomas, G. Neil; Lao, Xiang Qian; Jiang, Chao Qiang; Cheng, Kar Keung; Lam, Tai Hing

doi:10.1249/mss.0b013e31815b0db5

Cited by 242 publications

(202 citation statements)

References 24 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

191

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Two more papers were identified through the reference lists of the papers reviewed [28,29]. Overall, 23 studies were reviewed in the present paper [17-20,23,25,28-44] and their general characteristics are presented in Table 1.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Table 2 presents information from 16 studies [17-20,23,25,29-37,39] regarding the standard, unit, and activity value used, and the correlation of the objective standard with the IPAQ-SF and its associated effect size in the different studies examining physical activity on a continuum. Table 3 presents the remaining 7 studies which did not present information from continuous measures of physical activity [28,41], did not present information for the whole sample but in subgroups [40,43], and presented only correlations for specific intensity [38,42,44].…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Table 3 presents the studies that examined the validity of the IPAQ-SF by examining the correlation between the scale and the physical activity/fitness measures at different levels of intensity. This table includes information from 15 studies [20,23,25,28,30,34-38,40-44], 8 of which [20,23,25,30,34-37] presented overlapping data from continuous measures of physical activity are also included in Table 2. For studies that examined the validity of IPAQ-SF at specific levels of intensity, the correlation between the IPAQ-SF and the objective physical activity measures are shown in Table 3.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Variability in reported validity may be caused by several factors such as the demographic and cultural backgrounds of the participants, the way the information requested is processed and delivered, as well as variations in the "criterion gold-standard" used for objective comparison. Criterion measures used for IPAQ-SF validation have included the actometer [18], accelerometer [19] and pedometer [20], yet only one study has used the expensive doubly labeled water technique [21] as a criterion even though it has been recommended and is considered the most accurate objective measurement of physical activity [8,22]. In addition to traditional measures of physical activity, various fitness measures (e.g.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…For the second objective, we examined whether the demographics of different samples, the indices derived from objective standards or the IPAQ-SF, or additional moderators which had contributied to the different levels of validity reported. Since the IPAQ-SF has been consistently shown to have a high reliability (ranging from 0.66 to 0.88) [17,20,25], we will not study this property here. We examined studies that sought to validate both (a) the overall physical activity score from the IPAQ-SF, as well as (b) those that focused on restricted information from the scale, e.g., different levels of intensity (vigorous activity, moderate activity and walking).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Validity of the international physical activity questionnaire short form (IPAQ-SF): A systematic review

Lee

Macfarlane

Lam

et al. 2011

Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act

2,058

1,419

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundThe International Physical Activity Questionnaire - Short Form (IPAQ-SF) has been recommended as a cost-effective method to assess physical activity. Several studies validating the IPAQ-SF have been conducted with differing results, but no systematic review of these studies has been reported.MethodsThe keywords "IPAQ", "validation", and "validity" were searched in PubMed and Scopus. Studies published in English that validated the IPAQ-SF against an objective physical activity measuring device, doubly labeled water, or an objective fitness measure were included.ResultsTwenty-three validation studies were included in this review. There was a great deal of variability in the methods used across studies, but the results were largely similar. Correlations between the total physical activity level measured by the IPAQ-SF and objective standards ranged from 0.09 to 0.39; none reached the minimal acceptable standard in the literature (0.50 for objective activity measuring devices, 0.40 for fitness measures). Correlations between sections of the IPAQ-SF for vigorous activity or moderate activity level/walking and an objective standard showed even greater variability (-0.18 to 0.76), yet several reached the minimal acceptable standard. Only six studies provided comparisons between physical activity levels derived from the IPAQ-SF and those obtained from objective criterion. In most studies the IPAQ-SF overestimated physical activity level by 36 to 173 percent; one study underestimated by 28 percent.ConclusionsThe correlation between the IPAQ-SF and objective measures of activity or fitness in the large majority of studies was lower than the acceptable standard. Furthermore, the IPAQ-SF typically overestimated physical activity as measured by objective criterion by an average of 84 percent. Hence, the evidence to support the use of the IPAQ-SF as an indicator of relative or absolute physical activity is weak.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Validity of the international physical activity questionnaire short form (IPAQ-SF): A systematic review

Lee

Macfarlane

Lam

et al. 2011

Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act

2,058

1,419

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Identification and Evaluation of Self‐Report Physical Activity Instruments in Adults With Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review

Smith

Dziedzic

Quicke

et al. 2019

Arthritis Care & Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective. To identify and evaluate the measurement properties of self-report physical activity instruments suitable for patients with osteoarthritis (OA).Methods. We conducted a comprehensive 2-stage systematic review using multiple electronic databases, from inception until July 2018. In the stage 1 review, we sought to identify all self-report physical activity instruments used in individuals with joint pain attributable to OA in the foot, knee, hip, or hand. In the stage 2 review, we searched for and appraised studies investigating the measurement properties of the instruments identified. In both stages of the review, we screened all articles for study eligibility criteria, completed data extraction using the Qualitative Attributes and Measurement Properties of Physical Activity questionnaire checklist, and conducted methodology quality assessments using a modified COSMIN (COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments) checklist. Measurement properties for each physical activity instrument were evaluated and combined, using narrative synthesis.Results. In the stage 1 review, we identified 23 unique self-report physical activity instruments. In the stage 2 review, we identified 54 studies that evaluated the measurement properties of 13 of the 23 instruments identified. Instrument reliability varied from inadequate to adequate (intraclass correlation coefficient ≥0.7). Instrument construct and criterion validity assessment showed small to moderate correlations with direct measures of physical activity. Instrument responsiveness was assessed in only 1 instrument and was unable to detect changes in comparison to accelerometers.Conclusion. Although many instruments were identified as being potentially suitable for use in patients with OA, none demonstrated adequate measurement properties across all domains of reliability, validity, and responsiveness. Further high-quality assessment of self-report physical activity instruments is required before such measures can be recommended for use in OA research.

show abstract

Brachial‐ankle pulse wave velocity and cardiovascular risk factors in the non‐diabetic and newly diagnosed diabetic Chinese: Guangzhou Biobank Cohort Study‐CVD

Jiang

Lam

et al. 2010

Diabetes Metabolism Res

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Reliability and Validity of the IPAQ-Chinese

Cited by 242 publications

References 24 publications

Validity of the international physical activity questionnaire short form (IPAQ-SF): A systematic review

Validity of the international physical activity questionnaire short form (IPAQ-SF): A systematic review

Identification and Evaluation of Self‐Report Physical Activity Instruments in Adults With Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review

Brachial‐ankle pulse wave velocity and cardiovascular risk factors in the non‐diabetic and newly diagnosed diabetic Chinese: Guangzhou Biobank Cohort Study‐CVD

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About